diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'debian')
-rw-r--r-- | debian/patches/libpager-make-the-request-queue-more-memory-efficien.patch | 163 |
1 files changed, 163 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/debian/patches/libpager-make-the-request-queue-more-memory-efficien.patch b/debian/patches/libpager-make-the-request-queue-more-memory-efficien.patch new file mode 100644 index 00000000..57023592 --- /dev/null +++ b/debian/patches/libpager-make-the-request-queue-more-memory-efficien.patch @@ -0,0 +1,163 @@ +From b3fcdc50024b3837a76cd854d02a940dac2e5dc3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Justus Winter <4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> +Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 18:11:30 +0100 +Subject: [PATCH hurd] libpager: make the request queue more memory-efficient + +Previously, `pager_demuxer' allocated a chunk of memory for the +response message. But if memory gets scarce, the kernel will issue a +large number of paging requests to free up memory. In such a +situation, allocating memory is dangerous. + +Fix this by not allocating space for the response message, rather, use +a chunk of the workers stack space. Also, we only handle the `notify' +and `memory_object' protocol, which both only contain simple routines, +we only need a `mig_response_header_t'. + +* libpager/demuxer.c (struct request): Remove `inp' and `outp'. +(request_inp): New function. +(pager_demuxer): Do not allocate memory for the response. +(mig_reply_setup): New function. +(worker_func): Adjust accordingly. +--- + libpager/demuxer.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- + 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/libpager/demuxer.c b/libpager/demuxer.c +index efdf285..a06c4bf 100644 +--- a/libpager/demuxer.c ++++ b/libpager/demuxer.c +@@ -47,10 +47,16 @@ struct request + { + struct item item; + mig_routine_t routine; +- mach_msg_header_t *inp; +- mach_msg_header_t *outp; + }; + ++/* A struct request object is immediately followed by the received ++ message. */ ++static inline mach_msg_header_t * ++request_inp (const struct request *r) ++{ ++ return (mach_msg_header_t *) ((char *) r + sizeof *r); ++} ++ + /* A worker. */ + struct worker + { +@@ -81,10 +87,6 @@ pager_demuxer (struct requests *requests, + { + error_t err = MIG_NO_REPLY; + +- /* The maximum size of the reply is 2048 bytes. See the MIG source +- for details. */ +- const mach_msg_size_t max_size = 2048; +- + mig_routine_t routine; + if (! ((routine = _pager_seqnos_memory_object_server_routine (inp)) || + (routine = _pager_seqnos_notify_server_routine (inp)))) +@@ -94,7 +96,7 @@ pager_demuxer (struct requests *requests, + mach_msg_size_t padded_size = (inp->msgh_size + MASK) & ~MASK; + #undef MASK + +- struct request *r = malloc (sizeof *r + padded_size + max_size); ++ struct request *r = malloc (sizeof *r + padded_size); + if (r == NULL) + { + err = ENOMEM; +@@ -102,11 +104,7 @@ pager_demuxer (struct requests *requests, + } + + r->routine = routine; +- r->inp = (mach_msg_header_t *) ((char *) r + sizeof *r); +- memcpy (r->inp, inp, inp->msgh_size); +- +- r->outp = (mach_msg_header_t *) ((char *) r + sizeof *r + padded_size); +- memcpy (r->outp, outp, sizeof *outp); ++ memcpy (request_inp (r), inp, inp->msgh_size); + + pthread_mutex_lock (&requests->lock); + +@@ -126,6 +124,37 @@ pager_demuxer (struct requests *requests, + return TRUE; + } + ++/* XXX: The libc should provide this function. */ ++static void ++mig_reply_setup ( ++ const mach_msg_header_t *in, ++ mach_msg_header_t *out) ++{ ++ static const mach_msg_type_t RetCodeType = { ++ /* msgt_name = */ MACH_MSG_TYPE_INTEGER_32, ++ /* msgt_size = */ 32, ++ /* msgt_number = */ 1, ++ /* msgt_inline = */ TRUE, ++ /* msgt_longform = */ FALSE, ++ /* msgt_deallocate = */ FALSE, ++ /* msgt_unused = */ 0 ++ }; ++ ++#define InP (in) ++#define OutP ((mig_reply_header_t *) out) ++ OutP->Head.msgh_bits = ++ MACH_MSGH_BITS(MACH_MSGH_BITS_REMOTE(InP->msgh_bits), 0); ++ OutP->Head.msgh_size = sizeof *OutP; ++ OutP->Head.msgh_remote_port = InP->msgh_remote_port; ++ OutP->Head.msgh_local_port = MACH_PORT_NULL; ++ OutP->Head.msgh_seqno = 0; ++ OutP->Head.msgh_id = InP->msgh_id + 100; ++ OutP->RetCodeType = RetCodeType; ++ OutP->RetCode = MIG_BAD_ID; ++#undef InP ++#undef OutP ++} ++ + /* Consumes requests from the queue. */ + static void * + worker_func (void *arg) +@@ -133,6 +162,7 @@ worker_func (void *arg) + struct worker *self = (struct worker *) arg; + struct requests *requests = self->requests; + struct request *r = NULL; ++ mig_reply_header_t reply_msg; + + while (1) + { +@@ -165,7 +195,7 @@ worker_func (void *arg) + + for (i = 0; i < WORKER_COUNT; i++) + if (requests->workers[i].tag +- == (unsigned long) r->inp->msgh_local_port) ++ == (unsigned long) request_inp (r)->msgh_local_port) + { + /* Some other thread is working on that object. Delegate + the request to that worker. */ +@@ -174,18 +204,20 @@ worker_func (void *arg) + } + + /* Claim responsibility for this object by setting our tag. */ +- self->tag = (unsigned long) r->inp->msgh_local_port; ++ self->tag = (unsigned long) request_inp (r)->msgh_local_port; + + got_one: + pthread_mutex_unlock (&requests->lock); + ++ mig_reply_setup (request_inp (r), (mach_msg_header_t *) &reply_msg); ++ + /* Call the server routine. */ +- (*r->routine) (r->inp, r->outp); ++ (*r->routine) (request_inp (r), (mach_msg_header_t *) &reply_msg); + + /* What follows is basically the second part of + mach_msg_server_timeout. */ +- mig_reply_header_t *request = (mig_reply_header_t *) r->inp; +- mig_reply_header_t *reply = (mig_reply_header_t *) r->outp; ++ mig_reply_header_t *request = (mig_reply_header_t *) request_inp (r); ++ mig_reply_header_t *reply = &reply_msg; + + switch (reply->RetCode) + { +-- +2.1.3 + |