diff options
author | Justus Winter <4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> | 2014-05-26 11:23:49 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Justus Winter <4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> | 2014-05-26 11:23:49 +0200 |
commit | 9b25991841464f3206a90949840f409f8e7809f9 (patch) | |
tree | e8321aeb9e0bf9c5342f735df40577567edd4836 /debian/patches/0007-Avoid-compiler-warning-about-empty-bodies.patch | |
parent | d31dc81b516b9afd479cf9e8709790faca15d1e1 (diff) |
drop old patch series
Diffstat (limited to 'debian/patches/0007-Avoid-compiler-warning-about-empty-bodies.patch')
-rw-r--r-- | debian/patches/0007-Avoid-compiler-warning-about-empty-bodies.patch | 120 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 120 deletions
diff --git a/debian/patches/0007-Avoid-compiler-warning-about-empty-bodies.patch b/debian/patches/0007-Avoid-compiler-warning-about-empty-bodies.patch deleted file mode 100644 index 2add8b6d..00000000 --- a/debian/patches/0007-Avoid-compiler-warning-about-empty-bodies.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,120 +0,0 @@ -From 4b90feece926c69d1dbecb673c71cabb00378f87 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Justus Winter <4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> -Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 16:07:44 +0200 -Subject: [PATCH 07/11] Avoid compiler warning about empty bodies - -Make empty bodies of control flow statements more explicit. Doing so -will allow us to use stricter compiler settings. This would have -cought 4ece292c. - -* console-client/xkb/xkb.c: Make empty bodies more explicit -* libpipe/pipe.c: Likewise. -* mach-defpager/default_pager.c: Likewise. -* pfinet/linux-src/net/ipv4/fib_hash.c: Likewise. -* pflocal/connq.c: Likewise. -* pflocal/socket.c: Likewise. ---- - console-client/xkb/xkb.c | 3 ++- - libpipe/pipe.c | 4 +++- - mach-defpager/default_pager.c | 4 ++-- - pfinet/linux-src/net/ipv4/fib_hash.c | 2 +- - pflocal/connq.c | 2 +- - pflocal/socket.c | 4 +++- - 6 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) - -diff --git a/console-client/xkb/xkb.c b/console-client/xkb/xkb.c -index 0b43913..220701b 100644 ---- a/console-client/xkb/xkb.c -+++ b/console-client/xkb/xkb.c -@@ -606,10 +606,11 @@ clearcontrols (keypress_t key, boolctrls ctrls, int flags) - static void - lockcontrols (keypress_t key, boolctrls ctrls, int flags) - { -+ /* XXX this needs a closer look. */ - if (!key.rel) - { - //setcontrols (key, boolctrls, flags); -- if (!(flags & noLock)); -+ //if (!(flags & noLock)); - // lboolctrls |= boolctrls; - } - else -diff --git a/libpipe/pipe.c b/libpipe/pipe.c -index 1080b5d..f9300e7 100644 ---- a/libpipe/pipe.c -+++ b/libpipe/pipe.c -@@ -352,7 +352,9 @@ pipe_send (struct pipe *pipe, int noblock, void *source, - if (!err) - err = packet_set_ports (control_packet, ports, num_ports); - if (err) -- /* Trash CONTROL_PACKET somehow XXX */; -+ { -+ /* Trash CONTROL_PACKET somehow XXX */ -+ } - } - } - -diff --git a/mach-defpager/default_pager.c b/mach-defpager/default_pager.c -index f514ea6..380c724 100644 ---- a/mach-defpager/default_pager.c -+++ b/mach-defpager/default_pager.c -@@ -88,13 +88,13 @@ synchronized_printf (const char *fmt, ...) - #if 0 - #define dprintf(f, x...) synchronized_printf (f, ##x) - #else --#define dprintf(f, x...) -+#define dprintf(f, x...) (void) 0 - #endif - - #if 0 - #define ddprintf(f, x...) synchronized_printf (f, ##x) - #else --#define ddprintf(f, x...) -+#define ddprintf(f, x...) (void) 0 - #endif - - /* -diff --git a/pfinet/linux-src/net/ipv4/fib_hash.c b/pfinet/linux-src/net/ipv4/fib_hash.c -index d9e029c..e3987ea 100644 ---- a/pfinet/linux-src/net/ipv4/fib_hash.c -+++ b/pfinet/linux-src/net/ipv4/fib_hash.c -@@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ static void rtmsg_fib(int, struct fib_node*, int, int, - struct nlmsghdr *n, - struct netlink_skb_parms *); - #else --#define rtmsg_fib(a, b, c, d, e, f) -+#define rtmsg_fib(a, b, c, d, e, f) (void) 0 - #endif - - -diff --git a/pflocal/connq.c b/pflocal/connq.c -index d88711e..d86f9a2 100644 ---- a/pflocal/connq.c -+++ b/pflocal/connq.c -@@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ connq_listen (struct connq *cq, struct timespec *tsp, struct sock **sock) - request and another listener (should) eventually come along. - (In fact it is very probably as the caller has likely done a - select and will now follow up with an accept.) */ -- ; -+ { /* Do nothing. */ } - - out: - pthread_mutex_unlock (&cq->lock); -diff --git a/pflocal/socket.c b/pflocal/socket.c -index 7142c6e..792c637 100644 ---- a/pflocal/socket.c -+++ b/pflocal/socket.c -@@ -198,7 +198,9 @@ S_socket_accept (struct sock_user *user, - ports_port_deref (peer_addr); - } - else -- /* TEAR DOWN THE CONNECTION XXX */; -+ { -+ /* TEAR DOWN THE CONNECTION XXX */ -+ } - } - } - --- -2.0.0.rc2 - |