1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
|
[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]]
[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable
id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this
document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or
any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant
Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license
is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation
License|/fdl]]."]]"""]]
[[!tag open_issue_porting]]
IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2012-03-18:
<antrik> Wayland should be very portable. all the system dependencies are
in the infrastructure, such as DRI
<antrik> we have had a DRI task (for X.Org) for years
<antrik> (in fact I would be the right person to implement this,
considering my background -- by quite frankly, I doubt I'll ever do it)
<tschwinge> http://xorg.freedesktop.org/wiki/Hurd_Porting
IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2012-03-20:
<youlysses> Is wayland something that will be semi-easy to port to the
hurd? I saw GNOME is heading in this direction.
<pinotree> wayland at the moment is linux only
<tschwinge> youlysses: A DRI implementation will be needed.
<pinotree> that, and libdrm compiling
<youlysses> So it will take some work ... but theres no *HUGE* design
decison that would inhibit it?
<pinotree> i know it uses epoll, for instance
<tschwinge> youlysses: I cannot judge how complex a DRI system is, and how
much needs to be designed vs. implemented.
|
