1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
|
[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2012, 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]]
[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable
id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this
document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or
any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant
Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license
is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation
License|/fdl]]."]]"""]]
[[!tag open_issue_glibc open_issue_gnumach open_issue_hurd open_issue_mig]]
# IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2012-07-04
<braunr> we should perhaps build the hurd with -fno-strict-aliasing,
considering the number of warnings i can see during the build :/
<pinotree> braunr: wouldn't be better to "just" fix the mig-generated stubs
instead?
<braunr> pinotree: if we can rely on gcc for the warnings, yes
<braunr> but i suspect there might be other silent issues in very old code
# IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2012-07-12
<braunr> btw, i'm building glibc right now, and i can see a few strict
aliasing warnings
<braunr> fixing them will allow us to avoid wasting time on very obscure
issues (if gcc catches them all)
<tschwinge> The strict aliasing things should be fixed, yes. Some might be
from MIG.
# IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2013-10-17
<braunr> we should build gnumach and the hurd with -fno-strict-aliasing
<pinotree> aren't the mig-generated stubs the only issues related to that?
<braunr> no
<teythoon> b/c we often have pointers of different type pointing to the
same address? for example code using libports?
<braunr> the old linux code, including pfinet, and even the hurd libraries,
use techniques that assume aliasing
<braunr> exactly
<teythoon> right, I agree
|