1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
|
[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]]
[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable
id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this
document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or
any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant
Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license
is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation
License|/fdl]]."]]"""]]
[[!tag open_issue_glibc]]
# Python
IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2011-04-13
<abeaumont> ok, cause of first python testsuite failure located, now the
hard part, how to best fix it :)
<abeaumont> how to redesign the code to avoid the problem... that's the
hard part, mostly cause i lack contextual info
<abeaumont> tschwinge: the problem is pretty much summarized by this
comment in _hurd_select (in glibc): /* If one descriptor is bogus, we
fail completely. */
<pochu> does POSIX say anything about what to do if one fd is invalid?
<pochu> and the other question is why python is calling select() with an
invalid fd
<abeaumont> pochu: yep, it says it should not fail completelly
<pochu> then that's our bug :)
<pinotree> abeaumont: just note that (at least on debian) some tests may
hang forever or cause hurd/mach to die
<pinotree> abeaumont: see in the debian/rules of the packaging of each
pythonX.Y source
<pinotree> ... there's a list of the tests excluded from the test suite run
<abeaumont> well, to be precise, python has a configure check for
'broken_poll' which hurd fails, and therefore python's select module is
not built, and anything depending on it fails
<abeaumont> broken_poll checks exactly for that posix requirement
<abeaumont> the reason for python using a non-existant
descriptor... unknown :D
<pochu> we should fix select to not fail miserably in that case
<pinotree> abeaumont: we have a patch to fix the broken poll check to
actually disable the poll module
<pochu> pinotree: but the proper fix is to fix select(), which is what
abeaumont is looking at
<abeaumont> pinotree: i'd say that's exactly what python's configure check
does itself -- disable building the select module
<pochu> abeaumont: what pinotree means is that the check is broken, see
http://patch-tracker.debian.org/patch/series/view/python2.6/2.6.6-8/hurd-broken-poll.diff
<pinotree> yes, the configure check for poll does the check, but not
everything of the poll module gets disabled (and you get a build failure)
---
See also [[select]] and [[service_solahart_jakarta_selatan__082122541663/select_vs_signals]].
|
