summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/open_issues/nptl.mdwn
blob: 3c84bfb04b812f3086b4b145fc765c7e668d3112 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2010, 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]]

[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable
id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this
document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or
any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant
Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.  A copy of the license
is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation
License|/fdl]]."]]"""]]

[[!tag open_issue_libpthread open_issue_glibc]]

[[!toc]]


# IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2010-07-31

    <tschwinge> Other question: how difficult is a NPTL port?  Futexes and some kernel interfaces for scheduling stuff etc. -- what else?
    <youpi> actually NPTL doesn't _require_ futexes
    <youpi> it just requires low-level locks
    <youpi> Mmm, it seems to be so only in principle
    <youpi> I can see futex names here and there in the generic code
    <youpi> looks like Drepper isn't disciplined enough in that area either
    <tschwinge> (well, why would he...)
    <youpi> I'm not sure we really want to port NPTL
    <tschwinge> OK.
    <youpi> Drepper will keep finding things to add
    <youpi> while the interface between glibc and libpthread isn't increasing _so_ much
    <tschwinge> ... and even less so the interfavce that actual applications are using.
    <tschwinge> We'd need to evaluate which benefits NPTL would bring.


# IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2013-08-05

    <gnu_srs> Hi, looks like kfreebsd are now using an NPTL-based pthread
      library: FBTL, http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2013/07/msg00060.html
    <gnu_srs> Anything of interest for porting to Hurd? See also
      http://lists.debian.org/debian-hurd/2013/08/msg00000.html
    <azeem> Petr could've been more verbose in his announcements
    <pinotree> and there's
      http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/open_issues/nptl.html in our wiki
    <azeem> well, it seems to work fine for kFreeBSD:
      http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2013/07/msg00134.html
    <azeem> and http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2013/07/msg00138.html


---

# Resources

  * <http://www.akkadia.org/drepper/nptl-design.pdf>

  * <http://nptltracetool.sourceforge.net/>

  * <http://posixtest.sourceforge.net/>