blob: 114dfbbf70b15b4e14a1430ad8963123cbdf834a (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
|
[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]]
[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable
id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this
document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or
any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant
Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license
is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation
License|/fdl]]."]]"""]]
There is static and dynamic code analysis. This overlaps with [[debugging]].
* [[GCC]]'s warnings. Yes, really.
* [Static Source Code Analysis Tools for C](http://spinroot.com/static/)
* [[!wikipedia List_of_tools_for_static_code_analysis]]
* Coccinelle
* <http://lwn.net/Articles/315686/>
* <http://www.google.com/search?q=coccinelle+analysis>
* clang
* <http://www.google.com/search?q=clang+analysis>
* Linux' sparse
* <https://sparse.wiki.kernel.org/>
* <http://klee.llvm.org/>
* <http://blog.llvm.org/2010/04/whats-wrong-with-this-code.html>
* [[Valgrind]]
* [Smatch](http://smatch.sourceforge.net/)
* [Parfait](http://labs.oracle.com/projects/parfait/)
* <http://lwn.net/Articles/344003/>
* [Saturn](http://saturn.stanford.edu/)
* [Flawfinder](http://www.dwheeler.com/flawfinder/)
* [sixgill](http://sixgill.org/)
* [Coverity](http://www.coverity.com/) -- commercial?
* <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_Fence>
* <http://sourceforge.net/projects/duma/>
* <http://wiki.debian.org/Hardening>
* <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CompilerFlags>
|
