1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
|
[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]]
[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable
id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this
document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or
any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant
Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license
is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation
License|/fdl]]."]]"""]]
The `ufs` translator supports some kind of the Unix File System. Beware, we're
not aware of anybody having used/tested it in ages, so maybe it is very broken
and will eat your data.
# IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2013-08-30
[[!tag open_issue_hurd]]
<Arne`> There might be a copyright problem: <nalaginrut> well, there seems
BSD-4clauses in the code:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/hurd/hurd.git/tree/ufs/alloc.c
<Arne`> braunr, tschwinge: Do you have any info on that? 4-clause BSD and
GPL on the same code are a license incompatibility…
<tschwinge> Arne`: I've put it onto my (long) TODO list.
<tschwinge> Easiest solution might be: rm -rf ufs.
<nalaginrut> will these affected code rewritten? or just modify license?
<mark_weaver> only the regents of the University of California could choose
to modify the license.
<youpi> nalaginrut: one can't modify a licence if one is not the author
<youpi> we can simply dump the code
<mark_weaver> s/author/owner/
<tschwinge> As I suppose ufs is unused/untested for a decade or so, I'd
have no issues with simply removing it from the tree, together with
ufs-fsck and ufs-utils.
<pinotree> tschwinge: or maybe extract the ufs stuff in an own repo, to be
imported as branch in incubator or own hurd/ufs.git?
<tschwinge> Sure, why not.
|
