summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/open_issues
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'open_issues')
-rw-r--r--open_issues/gccgo.mdwn8
-rw-r--r--open_issues/glibc.mdwn52
-rw-r--r--open_issues/glibc/t/tls-threadvar.mdwn66
3 files changed, 75 insertions, 51 deletions
diff --git a/open_issues/gccgo.mdwn b/open_issues/gccgo.mdwn
index 0ecc1228..e9fbf0f1 100644
--- a/open_issues/gccgo.mdwn
+++ b/open_issues/gccgo.mdwn
@@ -30,6 +30,14 @@ First, make the language functional, have its test suite pass without errors.
[[!inline pages=community/gsoc/project_ideas/gccgo feeds=no]]
+
+## Svante's work
+
+Per [[!message-id "1335509732.3707.179.camel@hp.my.own.domain"]], Svante has
+been working on this, has some (unpublished) patches, and this is currently
+blocked on [[`getcontext`/`setcontext`|open_issues/glibc/t/tls-threadvar]].
+
+
---
diff --git a/open_issues/glibc.mdwn b/open_issues/glibc.mdwn
index 0df40ae5..33a1a071 100644
--- a/open_issues/glibc.mdwn
+++ b/open_issues/glibc.mdwn
@@ -259,54 +259,7 @@ Last reviewed up to the [[Git mirror's d3bd58cf0a027016544949ffd27300ac5fb01bb8
<youpi> so I'd say ignore the error for now, we'll add the
declaration
- * `getcontext`/`setcontext`
-
- Needed for [[gccgo]].
-
- IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2012-04-19:
-
- <gnu_srs> How much work/knowledge is needed to implement
- getcontext/setcontext?
- <gnu_srs> Any already implemented alternatives available?
- <youpi> x86 registers knowledge, as well as unix signal masks
- <youpi> there's the linux implementation that can be taken as an
- exxample, but the signal part has to be rewritten
- <gnu_srs> Well, it's a pity they are not implemented. That's the
- remaining hurdle to get gccgo working :-(
- <youpi> uh :/
- <gnu_srs> Everything builds, but the testsuite fails due to these
- missing functions.
- <gnu_srs> Regarding getcontext/setcontext they seem to be written
- in assembly for linux but the code is not very long.
- <gnu_srs> How much effort would it be to write something similar
- for Hurd? Anybody fluent in asm?
- <gnu_srs> And registers and signals.
- <tschwinge> gnu_srs: Signals is the key thing -- everything else we
- can probably just copy. I have never/not yet looked at it,
- though.
- <gnu_srs> For kfreebsd it is written in C: kern_context.c, 3/4 in
- one file: getcontext, setcontext, swapcontext, not makecontext.
- <gnu_srs> Dunno how much assembly calls used though.
- <gnu_srs> Hi, any preferences about implementing get/setcontext in
- C or Asm?
- <tschwinge> gnu_srs: I think these will have to be implemented in
- assembly. Based on the Linux x86 variants.
-
- IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2012-04-20:
-
- <tschwinge> youpi: Your understanding of that is better than mine
- -- the *context stuff can't be very useful at the moment, because
- when the user changes uc_stack.ss_sp (which the glibc tests are
- doing), we're losing access to the _hurd_threadvars. Correct?
- <tschwinge> At least the getcontext test works, the other get a
- SIGILL.
- <tschwinge> others
- <tschwinge> _hurd_threadvars issue is just guessing.
- <youpi> tschwinge: yes, threadvars are on the stack
- <youpi> threadvars is not much code, it should just work, but care
- has to be taken on the libpthread/libthread side, which does some
- initialization
- <tschwinge> OK, that at least matches my understanding.
+ * [[`getcontext`/`setcontext`|t/tls-threadvar]]
* `futimesat`
@@ -1321,7 +1274,8 @@ Failures, mostly in order of appearance:
getcontext failed, errno: 1073741902.
- Is not implemented; see above. In 8958805c11c741d9211e20612c86271d906c9a0b
+ [[Not implemented|t/tls-threadvar]].
+ In 8958805c11c741d9211e20612c86271d906c9a0b
testing, `stdlib/bug-getcontext.out` now says: *Skipping test; no support
for FP exceptions.*, in cba1c83ad62a11347684a9daf349e659237a1741 testing,
it's back to the previous failure.
diff --git a/open_issues/glibc/t/tls-threadvar.mdwn b/open_issues/glibc/t/tls-threadvar.mdwn
index 4afd8a1a..5f1345c6 100644
--- a/open_issues/glibc/t/tls-threadvar.mdwn
+++ b/open_issues/glibc/t/tls-threadvar.mdwn
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
-[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2011, 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]]
+[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2011, 2012, 2013 Free Software Foundation,
+Inc."]]
[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable
id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this
@@ -14,7 +15,10 @@ This basically means to get rid of `sysdeps/mach/hurd/bits/libc-tsd.h` (and
thus the `_HURD_THREADVAR_*`/`_hurd_threadvar_location` interface), and
directly use `__thread` instead.
-IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2011-10-23:
+[[!toc]]
+
+
+# IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2011-10-23
<tschwinge> youpi: If we want to replace threadvars with TLS, there is one
problem: the threadvars interface is publically exported:
@@ -58,3 +62,61 @@ dropped altogether, and `__thread` directly be used in glibc.
email -- rmcgrath wanted to find some time this week to comment/help, and
I take it you don't have any immediate comments to that issue?
<youpi> I saw the mails, but didn't investigate at all
+
+[[!message-id "878vdyqht3.fsf@kepler.schwinge.homeip.net"]].
+
+
+# `getcontext`/`setcontext`
+
+Needed for [[gccgo]].
+
+Instead of adding support for `getcontext`/`setcontext` within the Hurd
+threadvar context, which might become a bit ugly, the idea is to get rid of
+Hurd threadvars and replace them with TLS (as we want to, anyway).
+
+
+## IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2012-04-19
+
+ <gnu_srs> How much work/knowledge is needed to implement
+ getcontext/setcontext?
+ <gnu_srs> Any already implemented alternatives available?
+ <youpi> x86 registers knowledge, as well as unix signal masks
+ <youpi> there's the linux implementation that can be taken as an
+ exxample, but the signal part has to be rewritten
+ <gnu_srs> Well, it's a pity they are not implemented. That's the
+ remaining hurdle to get gccgo working :-(
+ <youpi> uh :/
+ <gnu_srs> Everything builds, but the testsuite fails due to these
+ missing functions.
+ <gnu_srs> Regarding getcontext/setcontext they seem to be written
+ in assembly for linux but the code is not very long.
+ <gnu_srs> How much effort would it be to write something similar
+ for Hurd? Anybody fluent in asm?
+ <gnu_srs> And registers and signals.
+ <tschwinge> gnu_srs: Signals is the key thing -- everything else we
+ can probably just copy. I have never/not yet looked at it,
+ though.
+ <gnu_srs> For kfreebsd it is written in C: kern_context.c, 3/4 in
+ one file: getcontext, setcontext, swapcontext, not makecontext.
+ <gnu_srs> Dunno how much assembly calls used though.
+ <gnu_srs> Hi, any preferences about implementing get/setcontext in
+ C or Asm?
+ <tschwinge> gnu_srs: I think these will have to be implemented in
+ assembly. Based on the Linux x86 variants.
+
+
+### IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2012-04-20
+
+ <tschwinge> youpi: Your understanding of that is better than mine
+ -- the *context stuff can't be very useful at the moment, because
+ when the user changes uc_stack.ss_sp (which the glibc tests are
+ doing), we're losing access to the _hurd_threadvars. Correct?
+ <tschwinge> At least the getcontext test works, the other get a
+ SIGILL.
+ <tschwinge> others
+ <tschwinge> _hurd_threadvars issue is just guessing.
+ <youpi> tschwinge: yes, threadvars are on the stack
+ <youpi> threadvars is not much code, it should just work, but care
+ has to be taken on the libpthread/libthread side, which does some
+ initialization
+ <tschwinge> OK, that at least matches my understanding.