summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/hurd/translator/procfs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'hurd/translator/procfs')
-rw-r--r--hurd/translator/procfs/jkoenig/discussion.mdwn53
1 files changed, 51 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/hurd/translator/procfs/jkoenig/discussion.mdwn b/hurd/translator/procfs/jkoenig/discussion.mdwn
index e7fdf46e..182b438b 100644
--- a/hurd/translator/procfs/jkoenig/discussion.mdwn
+++ b/hurd/translator/procfs/jkoenig/discussion.mdwn
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ IRC, #hurd, around October 2010
owner, but always with root group
-# `/proc/$pid/stat` being 400 and not 444, and some more
+# `/proc/[PID]/stat` being 400 and not 444, and some more
IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2011-03-27
@@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2011-07-22
server anyway, I think.
-# `/proc/mounts`, `/proc/$pid/mounts`
+# `/proc/mounts`, `/proc/[PID]/mounts`
IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2011-07-25
@@ -277,3 +277,52 @@ Needed by glibc's `pldd` tool (commit
<antrik> it's very weird for example for fd connected to files that have
been unlinked. it looks like a broken symlink, but when dereferencing
(e.g. with cp), you get the actual file contents...
+
+
+# `/proc/[PID]/maps`
+
+## IRC, OFTC, #debian-hurd, 2012-06-20
+
+ <pinotree> bdefreese: the two elfutils tests fail because there are no
+ /proc/$pid/maps files
+ <pinotree> that code is quite relying on linux features, like locating the
+ linux kernel executables and their modules, etc
+ <pinotree> (see eg libdwfl/linux-kernel-modules.c)
+ <pinotree> refactor elfutils to have the linux parts executed only on linux
+ :D
+ <bdefreese> Oh yeah, the maintainer already seems really thrilled about
+ Hurd.. Did you see
+ http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=662041 ?
+ <pinotree> kurt is generally helpful with us (= hurd)
+ <pinotree> most probably there he is complaining that we let elfutils build
+ with nocheck (ie skipping the test suite run) instead of investigate and
+ report why the test suite failed
+
+
+# IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2011-06-19
+
+ <pinotree> jkoenig: procfs question: in process.c, process_lookup_pid, why
+ is the entries[2].hook line repeated twice?
+ <jkoenig> pinotree, let me check
+ <jkoenig> pinotree, it's probably just a mistake, there's no way the second
+ one has any effect
+ <pinotree> jkoenig: i see, it looked like you c&p'd that code accidentally
+ <jkoenig> pinotree, it's probably what happened, yes.
+
+
+# IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2012-06-30
+
+ <pinotree> btw, what do you think about making jkoening's procfs master the
+ real master?
+ <youpi> probably a good idea
+ <youpi> it does work quite well, except a few pidof hangs
+ <pinotree> surely better than the old one :)
+ <youpi> yes :)
+
+
+# `/proc/[PID]/cwd`
+
+## IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2012-06-30
+
+ * pinotree has a local work to add the /proc/$pid/cwd symlink, but relying
+ on "internal" (but exported) glibc functions