summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/faq/posix_compatibility
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'faq/posix_compatibility')
-rw-r--r--faq/posix_compatibility/discussion.mdwn25
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 25 deletions
diff --git a/faq/posix_compatibility/discussion.mdwn b/faq/posix_compatibility/discussion.mdwn
deleted file mode 100644
index 0d722c9e..00000000
--- a/faq/posix_compatibility/discussion.mdwn
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,25 +0,0 @@
-[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2010, 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]]
-
-[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable
-id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this
-document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or
-any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant
-Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license
-is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation
-License|/fdl]]."]]"""]]
-
-[[!tag open_issue_documentation]]
-
-\#hurd IRC channel on Freenode, 2010-12-21:
-
- <antrik> tschwinge: the writeup ignores the fact that POSIX compatibility
- is not only for applications, but also for users familiar with the UNIX
- environment
- <antrik> also, I still don't buy the fact that most software is not written
- for POSIX. even if assuming that GNOME programs don't use POSIX (which is
- only half true), there is a lot of other software in a system that is
- just as important, though less visible
- <antrik> (server software, startup system, device management, automation,
- ...)
- <antrik> tschwinge: BTW, I meant to (and partially did) write a blog
- article on this topic -- but I didn't get around to finish it...