summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--user/scolobb.mdwn54
1 files changed, 27 insertions, 27 deletions
diff --git a/user/scolobb.mdwn b/user/scolobb.mdwn
index 2b518b06..fd6c6aad 100644
--- a/user/scolobb.mdwn
+++ b/user/scolobb.mdwn
@@ -71,39 +71,39 @@ For documentation, see [[hurd/translator/unionmount]].
(Dates in brackets show the approximate deadline)
-* **Learn texinfo.** (Fri, 5 Jun) In order to produce canonical
+* **Learn texinfo.** *(5 Jun)* In order to produce canonical
documentation I will have to learn the texinfo documentation format.
-* **Write documentation for `unionmount`.** (Fri, 5 Jun) The basic
+* **Write documentation for `unionmount`.** *(5 Jun)* The basic
unionmount functionality being finished, it has to be documented
properly, lest it should lag behind and remain unfinished
eventually.
-* **Write documentation for `unionfs`.** (Fri, 5 Jun) `unionfs`
- is not exactly well-documented at the moment, the only help being
- provided by the comments in the sources. The goal is to write a more
- coherent documentation.
-
-* **Implement merging rules.** Some details are still awaiting
- discovery by me.
-
-* **Employ `unionmount` in eth-multiplexer.** I still have to scrounge
- for details.
-
-* **Decide as to location of unionmount.** Presently, `unionmount` is
- a (local) branch in `unionfs` git repository. The first step of
- publishing it is planned to be pushing it to the Savannah `unionfs`
- repository. Some agree that there should also be a second step
- consisting in splitting `unionmount` in a separate git repository,
- since the destinations of `unionfs` and `unionmount` are *similar*,
- and not identical.
-
-* **Use a different (better?) implementation idea.** It has been
- pointed out several times that `unionmount` could be implemented not
- by forking off `unionfs`, but by keeping the merging functionality
- in a stand-alone module (which could then be used by `unionfs` as
- well). Different implementation ideas with their own specific
- advantages may also arise in the future.
+* **Write documentation for `unionfs`.** *(5 Jun)* `unionfs` is not
+ exactly well-documented at the moment, the only help being provided
+ by the comments in the sources. The goal is to write a more coherent
+ documentation.
+
+* **Implement merging rules.** *(1 Aug)* Some details are still
+ awaiting discovery by me.
+
+* **Employ `unionmount` in eth-multiplexer.** *(10 Aug)* I still have
+ to scrounge for details.
+
+* **Decide as to location of unionmount.** *(1 Aug)* Presently,
+ `unionmount` is a (local) branch in `unionfs` git repository. The
+ first step of publishing it is planned to be pushing it to the
+ Savannah `unionfs` repository. Some agree that there should also be
+ a second step consisting in splitting `unionmount` in a separate git
+ repository, since the destinations of `unionfs` and `unionmount` are
+ *similar*, and not identical.
+
+* **Use a different (better?) implementation idea.** *(17 Aug)* It has
+ been pointed out several times that `unionmount` could be
+ implemented not by forking off `unionfs`, but by keeping the merging
+ functionality in a stand-alone module (which could then be used by
+ `unionfs` as well). Different implementation ideas with their own
+ specific advantages may also arise in the future.
---