summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--hurd-and-linux.html104
-rw-r--r--hurd/documentation.mdwn2
-rw-r--r--hurd/documentation/hurd-and-linux.html47
3 files changed, 49 insertions, 104 deletions
diff --git a/hurd-and-linux.html b/hurd-and-linux.html
deleted file mode 100644
index d9181d88..00000000
--- a/hurd-and-linux.html
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,104 +0,0 @@
-<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0//EN"
- "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/strict.dtd">
-<HTML>
-<HEAD>
-<TITLE>The Hurd and Linux - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation (FSF)</TITLE>
-<LINK REV="made" HREF="mailto:web-hurd@gnu.org">
-<META NAME="keywords" CONTENT="hurd, linux">
-</HEAD>
-<BODY BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF" TEXT="#000000" LINK="#1F00FF" ALINK="#FF0000" VLINK="#9900DD">
-
-<H1>The Hurd and Linux</H1>
-[
-<!-- Please keep this list alphabetical -->
-<!-- PLEASE UPDATE THE LIST AT THE BOTTOM (OR TOP) OF THE PAGE TOO! -->
- <A HREF="/software/hurd/hurd-and-linux.cn.html">Chinese(Simplified)</A>
-| <A HREF="/software/hurd/hurd-and-linux.zh.html">Chinese(Traditional)</A>
-| <A HREF="/software/hurd/hurd-and-linux.he.html">Hebrew</A>
-| <A HREF="/software/hurd/hurd-and-linux.html">English</A>
-| <a href="/software/hurd/hurd-and-linux.es.html">Spanish</a> <!-- Espa&ntilde;ol -->
-]
-
-<P>
-by <A HREF="http://www.stallman.org/">Richard Stallman</A>.
-
-<P>
-
-People sometimes ask, ``Why did the FSF develop a new free kernel
-instead of using Linux?'' It's a reasonable question. The answer,
-briefly, is that that is not the question we faced.
-
-<P>
-When we started developing the Hurd in 1990, the question facing us
-was, ``How can we get a free kernel for the GNU system?'' There was
-no free Unix-like kernel then, and we knew of no other plan to write
-one. The only way we could expect to have a free kernel was to write
-it ourselves. So we started.
-
-<P>
-We heard about Linux after its release. At that time, the question
-facing us was, ``Should we cancel the Hurd project and use Linux
-instead?''
-
-<P>
-We heard that Linux was not at all portable (this may not be true
-today, but that's what we heard then). And we heard that Linux was
-architecturally on a par with the Unix kernel; our work was leading to
-something much more powerful.
-
-<P>
-Given the years of work we had already put into the Hurd, we decided
-to finish it rather than throw them away.
-
-<P>
-If we did face the question that people ask---if Linux were already
-available, and we were considering whether to start writing another
-kernel---we would not do it. Instead we would choose another project,
-something to do a job that no existing free software can do.
-
-<P>
-But we did start the Hurd, back then, and now we have made it work.
-We hope its superior architecture will make free operating systems
-more powerful.
-
-<HR>
-
-[
-<!-- Please keep this list alphabetical -->
-<!-- PLEASE UPDATE THE LIST AT THE BOTTOM (OR TOP) OF THE PAGE TOO! -->
- <A HREF="/software/hurd/hurd-and-linux.cn.html">Chinese(Simplified)</A>
-| <A HREF="/software/hurd/hurd-and-linux.zh.html">Chinese(Traditional)</A>
-| <A HREF="/software/hurd/hurd-and-linux.he.html">Hebrew</A>
-| <A HREF="/software/hurd/hurd-and-linux.html">English</A>
-| <a href="/software/hurd/hurd-and-linux.es.html">Spanish</a> <!-- Espa&ntilde;ol -->
-]
-
-<HR>
-
-Return to <A HREF="/home.html">GNU's home page</A>.
-<P>
-FSF &amp; GNU inquiries &amp; questions to
-<A HREF="mailto:gnu@gnu.org"><EM>gnu@gnu.org</EM></A>.
-Other <A HREF="/home.html#ContactInfo">ways to contact</A> the FSF.
-<P>
-Comments on these web pages to
-<A HREF="mailto:web-hurd@gnu.org"><EM>web-hurd@gnu.org</EM></A>,
-send other questions to
-<A HREF="mailto:gnu@gnu.org"><EM>gnu@gnu.org</EM></A>.
-<P>
-Copyright (C) 1996, 1997, 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc.,
-59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111, USA
-<P>
-Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is
-permitted in any medium, provided this notice is preserved.
-
-<p>
-Updated:
-<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date$ $Author$
-<!-- timestamp end -->
-</p>
-
-<HR>
-</BODY>
-</HTML>
diff --git a/hurd/documentation.mdwn b/hurd/documentation.mdwn
index a8c3a988..a32bc84f 100644
--- a/hurd/documentation.mdwn
+++ b/hurd/documentation.mdwn
@@ -17,6 +17,8 @@ is included in the section entitled
* [[FAQ]]
+ * [[*The_Hurd_and_Linux*|hurd-and-linux]], a comment by Richard Stallman.
+
* [[*Towards_a_New_Strategy_of_OS_Design*|hurd-paper]], an architectural
overview by Thomas Bushnell, BSG.
diff --git a/hurd/documentation/hurd-and-linux.html b/hurd/documentation/hurd-and-linux.html
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..8eccd62c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/hurd/documentation/hurd-and-linux.html
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+[[meta copyright="Copyright © 1996, 1997, 1998, 2008 Free Software Foundation,
+Inc."]]
+
+[[meta license="Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is
+permitted in any medium, provided this notice is preserved."]]
+
+[[meta title="The Hurd and Linux"]]
+
+by <A HREF="http://www.stallman.org/">Richard Stallman</A>.
+
+<P>
+People sometimes ask, ``Why did the FSF develop a new free kernel
+instead of using Linux?'' It's a reasonable question. The answer,
+briefly, is that that is not the question we faced.
+
+<P>
+When we started developing the Hurd in 1990, the question facing us
+was, ``How can we get a free kernel for the GNU system?'' There was
+no free Unix-like kernel then, and we knew of no other plan to write
+one. The only way we could expect to have a free kernel was to write
+it ourselves. So we started.
+
+<P>
+We heard about Linux after its release. At that time, the question
+facing us was, ``Should we cancel the Hurd project and use Linux
+instead?''
+
+<P>
+We heard that Linux was not at all portable (this may not be true
+today, but that's what we heard then). And we heard that Linux was
+architecturally on a par with the Unix kernel; our work was leading to
+something much more powerful.
+
+<P>
+Given the years of work we had already put into the Hurd, we decided
+to finish it rather than throw them away.
+
+<P>
+If we did face the question that people ask---if Linux were already
+available, and we were considering whether to start writing another
+kernel---we would not do it. Instead we would choose another project,
+something to do a job that no existing free software can do.
+
+<P>
+But we did start the Hurd, back then, and now we have made it work.
+We hope its superior architecture will make free operating systems
+more powerful.