open_issues/binutils: Update.

2 files changed, 32 insertions, 83 deletions

diff --git a/toolchain/elfosabi_gnu.mdwn b/toolchain/elfosabi_gnu.mdwn
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..76711e3b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/toolchain/elfosabi_gnu.mdwn
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]]
+
+[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable
+id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this
+document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or
+any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant
+Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.  A copy of the license
+is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation
+License|/fdl]]."]]"""]]
+
+[[!meta title="ELFOSABI_GNU"]]
+
+GNU/Hurd uses the `ELFOSABI_GNU` value for operating system/ABI identification.
+This is shared with GNU/Linux.
+
+
+# History
+
+  * [[!debbug 630180]]
+  * [sourceware bug
+    12913](http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12913)
+  * [libc-alpha
+    thread](http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2011-06/threads.html#00087)
+    ([continues](http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2011-07/threads.html#00031))
+  * [bug-hurd
+    thread](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2011-06/threads.html#00060)
+    ([continues](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2011-07/threads.html#00020))
+  * [generic-abi
+    thread](http://groups.google.com/group/generic-abi/browse_frm/thread/194697b94a189063)
+  * [binutils
+    thread](http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2011-06/threads.html#00218)
+    ([continues](http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2011-07/threads.html#00033))
diff --git a/toolchain/elfosabi_hurd.mdwn b/toolchain/elfosabi_hurd.mdwn
deleted file mode 100644
index 4d60f761..00000000
--- a/toolchain/elfosabi_hurd.mdwn
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,83 +0,0 @@
-[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]]
-
-[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable
-id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this
-document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or
-any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant
-Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.  A copy of the license
-is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation
-License|/fdl]]."]]"""]]
-
-[[!meta title="ELFOSABI_HURD"]]
-
-[[!tag open_issue_binutils open_issue_glibc]]
-
-
-# [[!debbug 630180]]
-
-
-# [[open_issues/binutils]] commit 51b2f560ad035dffad3371093f8e5c80608d196c
-
-Usage of `ELFOSABI_LINUX`/`STB_GNU_UNIQUE`.  Has also been wrong before already
-with respect to `STT_GNU_IFUNC`?
-
-
-# IRC
-
-IRC, freenode, #debian-hurd, 2011-06-11
-
-    <pinotree> youpi: not that there would be any hope in that, but id you try
-      asking doko about the gcc miscompiling (wrong elf format) issue?
-    <youpi> I didn't
-    <youpi> I'm still investigating
-    <youpi> maybe it's a binutils change actually
-    <pinotree> youpi: hm, are you sure it could be binutils? after all, even
-      some .o files are produced with format gnu/linux, so there's no binutils
-      involved up to that point of thecompilation yet?
-    <youpi> as is
-    <youpi> "as", I mean
-    <pinotree> i see
-    <youpi> since it's so unclear, I really prefer to investigate before
-      bothering doko
-    <pinotree> youpi: maybe i could be wrong,
-    <pinotree> in binutils, bfd/elf.c, around lines 9580
-    <youpi> the faulty thing seems to be gnu_unique_object in the source .s
-      file produced by g++
-    <pinotree> that's what that comment (which changed wrt binutils from eg
-      march) says
-    <youpi> seems to concur with my comment above :)
-    <pinotree> http://paste.debian.net/119542/ ‘¡û extract of diff
-    <youpi> ok, that really seems the culprit
-    <youpi> starting reportbug
-    <pinotree> who's the fault then?
-    <youpi> binutils
-    <youpi> it shouldn't hardcode LINUX
-    <pinotree> g++ emitting those symbols, or binutil considering them "linux"?
-    <youpi> it's a GNU thing, not a Linux thing
-    <pinotree> ah ok
-    <youpi> it's the same dynamic linker actually
-    <pinotree> youpi: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10549
-    <pinotree> see the reporter :)
-    <youpi> heh
-    <pinotree> youpi: see also gas/config/obj-elf.c:1725
-    <pinotree> (another change related to that bug, it seems)
-
-IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2011-06-15
-
-    <jkoenig> also I still get an "ELF file OS ABI invalid" error with binutils
-      2.21.52.20110606-2+hurd.1, is that expected?
-    <youpi> tschwinge: oops, the OS ABI invalid is actually due to the file
-      being marked GNU/Hurd
-    <youpi> I guess the linker is simply not aware that it should accept
-      GNU/Hurd
-    <tschwinge> youpi: So we got to work on glibc'S ld.so to teach it aboput
-      the Hurd OS ABI?  (Or probably simply make that equivalent to the Linux
-      one?)
-    <youpi> probably simply an equivalent
-    <youpi> ELFOSABI_HURD is missing from elf/elf.h, for a start...
-    <youpi> linux' glibc has tests in lsdodefs.h
-    <youpi> the VALID_ELF_OSABI macro
-    <youpi> it's thus apparently a matter of providing an ldsodefs.h file with
-      VALID_ELF_HEADER, VALID_ELF_OSABI and VALID_ELF_ABIVERSION definitions
-    <youpi> (and include_next the generic one)
-    <youpi> I've prepared a patch for ldsodefs.h, I'll test it