summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/news
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorThomas Schwinge <thomas@schwinge.name>2011-10-11 01:11:16 +0200
committerThomas Schwinge <thomas@schwinge.name>2011-10-11 01:11:16 +0200
commitc5505b23551f708520194fbb4491432821f9d0a5 (patch)
tree9ae16f253bf4d8562b206444545454a209ba2fb5 /news
parentb0c02a6ac45b2c2c22ad5e242c1bbca46a79002f (diff)
news/2011-q2: Sequelae.
Diffstat (limited to 'news')
-rw-r--r--news/2011-q2-ps.mdwn40
-rw-r--r--news/2011-q2.mdwn72
2 files changed, 86 insertions, 26 deletions
diff --git a/news/2011-q2-ps.mdwn b/news/2011-q2-ps.mdwn
index 47370e46..5433f307 100644
--- a/news/2011-q2-ps.mdwn
+++ b/news/2011-q2-ps.mdwn
@@ -22,28 +22,22 @@ else="
After our last *[[Quarter of the Hurd, Q2 of 2011|2011-q2]]* has been picked
up by a bunch of news sites, blogs, and so on, discussions have been
-running all over the net *([lwn][], [reddit1][], [reddit2][],
-[h-online][], [slashdot][], [golem1][], [golem2][],
-[ih][innocenthacker], [netzwelt][], [tunnelbau][],
-[pro-linux][], [srini][], …)*. We are happy to see that there is
+running all over the net.
+
+> {{$news/2011-q2#lwn}}, {{$news/2011-q2#phoronix-1}},
+> {{$news/2011-q2#phoronix-2}}, {{$news/2011-q2#golem}},
+> {{$news/2011-q2#h-online}}, {{$news/2011-q2#innocenthacker}},
+> {{$news/2011-q2#netzwelt}}, {{$news/2011-q2#operation-tunnelbau}},
+> {{$news/2011-q2#osnews}}, {{$news/2011-q2#pro-linux}},
+> {{$news/2011-q2#reddit-1}}, {{$news/2011-q2#reddit-2}},
+> {{$news/2011-q2#slashdot}}, ...
+
+We are happy to see that there is
considerable interest in the Hurd; but we also saw some
misunderstandings, false rumors, and outdated information floating
around. Thus we will try to clarify the situation regarding some of
the more common misunderstandings.
-[reddit1]: http://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/j2ztr/rms_mlayout_finally_shout_its_alive_at_gnuhurd_thanks/
-[lwn]: http://lwn.net/Articles/451699/
-[h-online]: http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Hurd-Progresses-Debian-GNU-Hurd-by-end-o
-[reddit2]: http://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/ipxxt/debian_now_has_concrete_plans_to_bring_gnu_hurd/
-[golem1]: http://www.golem.de/1107/84947.html
-[golem2]: http://www.golem.de/1108/85430.html
-[slashdot]: http://news.slasd.h.ot.org/story/11/07/14/2141229/watch-out-linux-gnu-hurd-coming
-[innocenthacker]: http://www.innocenthacker.com/2011/07/debian-7-might-come-in-gnu-hurd-version.html
-[netzwelt]: http://www.netzwelt.de/news/87551-debian-7-0-wheezy-erste-plaene-hurd-statt-linux-kernel.html
-[tunnelbau]: http://blog.operation-tunnelbau.de/archives/66-Hurd-kommt-zusammen-mit-Duke-Nukem-Forever.-Fast..html
-[pro-linux]: http://www.pro-linux.de/news/1/17261/gnu-hurd-will-offiziell-in-naechste-debian-version.html
-[srini]: http://srinicame.blogspot.com/2011/07/debian-gnuhurd-trial-installation.html
-
* **Debian GNU/Hurd strives to become an official Debian port**:
The Debian GNU/Hurd team is working hard to prepare a technology
preview/release candidate for the next Debian release (Wheezy), to
@@ -118,7 +112,8 @@ the more common misunderstandings.
(similar to `GNU/Linux` or `GNU/kFreeBSD`) for clarity.
* **Performance**:
- The [benchmarks conducted by Phoronix](http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=debian_gnu_hurd&num=1)
+ The benchmarks conducted by Phoronix (as reported by
+ {{$2011-q2#phoronix-3}}) (Phoronix/Michael: thanks for doing these!)
attested very good performance to the Hurd.
Keep in mind though that these benchmarks were almost completely CPU-bound;
so they essentially just confirm that we don't do anything stupid
@@ -131,7 +126,7 @@ the more common misunderstandings.
which are currently the major bottleneck in most situations.
Nevertheless, these results are a hint
that the extra IPC required in microkernel systems
- [doesn't necessarily hamper performance](http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.51.16)
+ [[doesn't necessarily hamper performance|ipc#performance]]
quite as much as often believed.
We are glad to see such solid benchmarks
help dispel some of the myths around the Hurd :-)
@@ -156,13 +151,6 @@ the more common misunderstandings.
<!--
-slashdot
-
-and phoronix did some [performance tests of the Hurd][phorperf],
-[phorperf]: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=debian_gnu_hurd&num=1
-
----
-
IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2011-08-24:
< ArneBab> hurd related: I now think you were right, antrik: the hurd
diff --git a/news/2011-q2.mdwn b/news/2011-q2.mdwn
index 38d8c6a4..6194dd08 100644
--- a/news/2011-q2.mdwn
+++ b/news/2011-q2.mdwn
@@ -69,10 +69,82 @@ his Java/Hurd Google Summer of Code work.
[[!ymlfront data="""
+golem:
+
+ "Sebastian Grüner (golem): [Debian 7 kommt offiziell mit Hurd als
+ Kernel \[de\]](http://www.golem.de/1107/84947.html)"
+
+h-online:
+
+ "Dj Walker-Morgan (The H Open): [Hurd Progresses - Debian GNU/Hurd by end of
+ 2012?](http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Hurd-Progresses-Debian-GNU-Hurd-by-end-of-2012-1279253.html)"
+
+innocenthacker:
+
+ "Amit Khajuria (Innocent Hacker): [Debian 7 might come in a GNU Hurd
+ version](http://www.innocenthacker.com/2011/07/debian-7-might-come-in-gnu-hurd-version.html)"
+
+lwn:
+
+ "Joe 'Zonker' Brockmeier (LWN): [Signs of life from GNU
+ Hurd](http://lwn.net/Articles/452296/)"
+
+netzwelt:
+
+ "Markus Franz (netzwelt) [Debian 7.0 Wheezy: Erste Pläne für Hurd statt
+ Linux-Kernel
+ \[de\]](http://www.netzwelt.de/news/87551-debian-7-0-wheezy-erste-plaene-hurd-statt-linux-kernel.html)"
+
+operation-tunnelbau:
+
+ "Jens Reil: [Hurd kommt zusammen mit Duke Nukem
+ Forever. Fast. \[de\]](http://blog.operation-tunnelbau.de/archives/66-Hurd-kommt-zusammen-mit-Duke-Nukem-Forever.-Fast..html)"
+
+osnews:
+
+ "Thom Holwerda (OS News): [GNU Hurd Quarterly Status
+ Report](http://www.osnews.com/story/24942/GNU_Hurd_Quarterly_Status_Teport)"
+
+phoronix-1:
+
+ "Michael Larabel (Phoronix): [A Status Update On GNU Hurd: Java, Debian,
+ Money](http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=OTY2Nw)"
+
+phoronix-2:
+
+ "Michael Larabel (Phoronix): [Coming Up: Benchmarks Of GNU
+ Hurd](http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=OTY3NQ)"
+
+phoronix-3:
+
+ "Michael Larabel (Phoronix): [Test Driving GNU Hurd, With Benchmarks Against
+ Linux](http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=debian_gnu_hurd)"
+
+pro-linux:
+
+ "Hans-Joachim Baader (Pro Linux): [GNU Hurd will offiziell in nächste
+ Debian-Version
+ \[de\]](http://www.pro-linux.de/news/1/17261/gnu-hurd-will-offiziell-in-naechste-debian-version.html)"
+
+reddit-1:
+
+ "TheSilentNumber (reddit): [RMS may finally shout \"It's
+ alive!\"...](http://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/j2ztr/rms_mlayout_finally_shout_its_alive_at_gnuhurd_thanks/)"
+
+reddit-2:
+
+ "mepper (reddit): [Debian now has concrete
+ plans...](http://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/ipxxt/debian_now_has_concrete_plans_to_bring_gnu_hurd/)"
+
schmehl:
"Alexander \"Tolimar\" Reichle-Schmehl: [About Debian, The Hurd and Linux or
in short: Yes, we will still have a Linux
kernel](http://blog.schmehl.info/Debian/hurd-not-default)"
+slashdot:
+
+ "timothy (Slashdot): [Watch Out Linux, GNU Hurd
+ Coming](http://news.slashdot.org/story/11/07/14/2141229/watch-out-linux-gnu-hurd-coming)"
+
"""]]