diff options
author | Thomas Schwinge <thomas@schwinge.name> | 2011-11-04 19:22:41 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Thomas Schwinge <thomas@schwinge.name> | 2011-11-04 19:22:41 +0100 |
commit | e8ab9711504055c81d164aa35e0629c2c81f1082 (patch) | |
tree | 68d4b846188ad3a90cf7f732c849f85c5b3e8640 /glibc | |
parent | 5d44547d701fe96aef425c6e3f719df9a34581e8 (diff) | |
parent | be49aa7ddec52e121d562e14d4d93fd301b05fbb (diff) |
Merge remote-tracking branch 'fp/master'
Diffstat (limited to 'glibc')
-rw-r--r-- | glibc/ioctl.mdwn | 52 |
1 files changed, 52 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/glibc/ioctl.mdwn b/glibc/ioctl.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 00000000..e1a86f32 --- /dev/null +++ b/glibc/ioctl.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ +[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]] + +[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable +id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this +document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or +any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant +Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license +is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation +License|/fdl]]."]]"""]] + +[[!tag open_issue_documentation]] + +IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2011-10-31: + + <pinotree> is there some example of translator replying to custom ioctl's? + <pinotree> let's say you define some ioctl (those which can be represented) + using the _IOW etc macros; how would a translator (or something else) + "register" and reply to them? + <youpi> it's not an easy thing + <youpi> see hurd/hurd/tioctl.defs for instance + <youpi> that's where the 't' ioctls end up + <youpi> ('t' being the group in the _IOW macro) + <braunr> it's not that hard either + <pinotree> youpi: so you "roll" the ioctl to an ipc call with proper + parameters? + <braunr> yes + <pinotree> ah ok, i thought there was some way to hook new ioctl's, and + have libc send the whole stuff at once + <braunr> and the proper number (with a clear name) + <braunr> hm + <braunr> for many ioctls, you don't have to change libc + <youpi> yes, there's a script which produces the .defs from _IOW calls, + iirc + <youpi> or something like this + <youpi> there's also a hook thing in glibc, but for "sane" ioctls, that's + not needed + <youpi> (_hurd_lookup_ioctl_handler called by ioctl()) + <youpi> yes, see the rules in hurd/hurd/Makefile + <youpi> "The following rules assist in creating an `Xioctl.defs' file to + define RPCs that are sent primarily by ioctl commands." + <antrik> well, you can have perfectly sane ioctl()s that still can't be + expressed within the constraints of the IO* macros... but admittedly + that's rather uncommon + <antrik> (unless you consider passing of structs generally insane...) + <youpi> I didn't want to spend time on finding an appropriate adjective + instaed of "sane" + <youpi> while I knew he would understand what I meant (and you did) + <youpi> (though maybe not actually) + <youpi> by "sane", I mean, which use _IOW properly + <youpi> i.e. with a group, proper numbers, etc. + <youpi> (the imposed contraints on the parameters is obviously a flaw in + the hurdish ioctl design, and not insanity from structures) |