summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/faq
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorThomas Schwinge <thomas@schwinge.name>2011-03-28 10:30:54 +0200
committerThomas Schwinge <thomas@schwinge.name>2011-03-28 10:30:54 +0200
commit0cd321c45aea93ea9bbf2821c2b81a45a9124f8b (patch)
tree84dc3000069cc9c95ab45cda67cc39bf78471b9c /faq
parent1049f72d37aa1efc434c96eff42ad522eb331c90 (diff)
Move a bunch of IRC discussion logs to discussion subpages.
Diffstat (limited to 'faq')
-rw-r--r--faq/posix_compatibility.mdwn19
-rw-r--r--faq/posix_compatibility/discussion.mdwn25
2 files changed, 26 insertions, 18 deletions
diff --git a/faq/posix_compatibility.mdwn b/faq/posix_compatibility.mdwn
index a54822c5..4490b7cb 100644
--- a/faq/posix_compatibility.mdwn
+++ b/faq/posix_compatibility.mdwn
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]]
+[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2010, 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]]
[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable
id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this
@@ -30,20 +30,3 @@ striving for total POSIX compliance -- and the high-level programs (that is,
their users) may not even notice this, but we would avoid a lot of overhead
that comes with wrapping the [[Hurd interfaces|hurd/interface]] to be POSIX
compliant.
-
-
-\#hurd IRC channel on Freenode, 2010-12-21:
-
- <antrik> tschwinge: the writeup ignores the fact that POSIX compatibility
- is not only for applications, but also for users familiar with the UNIX
- environment
- <antrik> also, I still don't buy the fact that most software is not written
- for POSIX. even if assuming that GNOME programs don't use POSIX (which is
- only half true), there is a lot of other software in a system that is
- just as important, though less visible
- <antrik> (server software, startup system, device management, automation,
- ...)
- <antrik> tschwinge: BTW, I meant to (and partially did) write a blog
- article on this topic -- but I didn't get around to finish it...
-
-[[!tag open_issue_documentation]]
diff --git a/faq/posix_compatibility/discussion.mdwn b/faq/posix_compatibility/discussion.mdwn
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..0d722c9e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/faq/posix_compatibility/discussion.mdwn
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2010, 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]]
+
+[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable
+id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this
+document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or
+any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant
+Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license
+is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation
+License|/fdl]]."]]"""]]
+
+[[!tag open_issue_documentation]]
+
+\#hurd IRC channel on Freenode, 2010-12-21:
+
+ <antrik> tschwinge: the writeup ignores the fact that POSIX compatibility
+ is not only for applications, but also for users familiar with the UNIX
+ environment
+ <antrik> also, I still don't buy the fact that most software is not written
+ for POSIX. even if assuming that GNOME programs don't use POSIX (which is
+ only half true), there is a lot of other software in a system that is
+ just as important, though less visible
+ <antrik> (server software, startup system, device management, automation,
+ ...)
+ <antrik> tschwinge: BTW, I meant to (and partially did) write a blog
+ article on this topic -- but I didn't get around to finish it...