summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Hurd
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGrant Bowman <grantbow at grantbow dot com>2002-10-09 17:22:16 +0000
committerGrant Bowman <grantbow at grantbow dot com>2002-10-09 17:22:16 +0000
commit82d0c30b653cb1f69bd6f28e8245dd01fe69d7e3 (patch)
treebc9726f0ff3e13558670fc3254b0d892ffdaa9fa /Hurd
parent138b9ab67b17ee6913ad6d97e09b7f0b9c3a6ebe (diff)
none
Diffstat (limited to 'Hurd')
-rw-r--r--Hurd/DebianGNUHurdLicensing.mdwn2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/Hurd/DebianGNUHurdLicensing.mdwn b/Hurd/DebianGNUHurdLicensing.mdwn
index 3768792f..16b401b6 100644
--- a/Hurd/DebianGNUHurdLicensing.mdwn
+++ b/Hurd/DebianGNUHurdLicensing.mdwn
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-There are differences betwen the [Debian Free Software Guidelines](http://www.debian.org/social_contract#guidelines) (DFSG) and [Free Software](http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/free-sw.html) as defined by the Free Software Foundation. The FSF's GNU project is the sponsor of the GNU/Hurd project. Debian GNU/Hurd is a "port" or distribution of this software. I have not yet performed a comparison between the list of acceptable DFSG licenses (if a list exists) and the acceptable Free Software [license list](http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html). The packages marked "Essential" should be checked for the type of license they use.
+There are differences betwen the [Debian Free Software Guidelines](http://www.debian.org/social_contract#guidelines) (DFSG) and [Free Software](http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/free-sw.html) as defined by the Free Software Foundation. The FSF's GNU project is the sponsor of the GNU/Hurd project. Debian GNU/Hurd is a "port" or distribution of this software. I have not yet performed a comparison between the list of acceptable DFSG licenses (if a list exists) and the acceptable Free Software [license list](http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html). (Not directly related but for reference, her's the Open Source [license list](http://www.opensource.org/licenses/index.html)) The packages marked "Essential" should be checked for the type of license they use.
What will this consist of? In the end the result will need to be simply a list of packages with their license marked next to them. This will be relatively simple for those packages that use a standard license. Software that has it's own custom license will need to be categorized.