diff options
| author | Thomas Schwinge <thomas@schwinge.name> | 2011-01-08 00:23:31 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Thomas Schwinge <thomas@schwinge.name> | 2011-01-08 00:23:31 +0100 |
| commit | 9d64538617425f795e33d711d8bd4f5d823de8e7 (patch) | |
| tree | 7bd27567dd404bfa2c3de5949e8cf27715f4240d | |
| parent | 8e59767f344fd15cbb2e1adfa6137223adfe3ccb (diff) | |
open_issues/implementing_hurd_on_top_of_another_system: IRC, #hurd, 2010-12-28.
| -rw-r--r-- | open_issues/implementing_hurd_on_top_of_another_system.mdwn | 13 |
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/open_issues/implementing_hurd_on_top_of_another_system.mdwn b/open_issues/implementing_hurd_on_top_of_another_system.mdwn index 7e88e322..614cf442 100644 --- a/open_issues/implementing_hurd_on_top_of_another_system.mdwn +++ b/open_issues/implementing_hurd_on_top_of_another_system.mdwn @@ -65,3 +65,16 @@ IRC, #hurd, August / September 2010 the Hurd to Linux or BSD Continue reading about the [[benefits of a native Hurd implementation]]. + +--- + +IRC, #hurd, 2010-12-28 + + <antrik> kilobug: there is no real requirement for the Hurd to run on a + microkernel... as long as the important mechanisms are provided (most + notably external pagers and Mach IPC), the Hurd could run an top of + pretty much any kernel... + <antrik> whether it makes sense is another question of course :-) + <antrik> though I must say that I'm more and more convinced running the + Hurd on top of a monolithic kernel would actually be a useful approach + for the time being... |