summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/open_issues/glibc/getlogin_r.mdwn
blob: 9980ea1f5171bbb8844cc8fa140f1ce316999bb6 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]]

[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable
id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this
document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or
any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant
Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.  A copy of the license
is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation
License|/fdl]]."]]"""]]

[[!meta title="getlogin_r"]]

[[!tag open_issue_glibc]]


# IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2012-04-23

    * pinotree spots how our getlogin_r() implementation uses a static
        buffer...
    <braunr> oO
    <pinotree> braunr: yeah, the _r means "reentrantbutnotreally" xD
    <braunr> pinotree: that's amazing ..
    <antrik> pinotree: without having checked the actual implementation, that
      doesn't sound like a problem...
    <antrik> caching doesn't break reentrancy. the problem with the plain
      getlogin() is that a static buffer is *returned to the user*
    <pinotree> antrik: http://paste.debian.net/164727/
    <braunr> ah, caching
    <pinotree> i don't think this is caching at all
    <antrik> pinotree: OK, not actually caching... but same effect as far as I
      can tell
    <antrik> pinotree: or is it the fixed size of the temporary variable you
      are concerned about?
    <pinotree> antrik: my concern was about the "static" of the buffer used for
      the get_login rpc
    <antrik> pinotree: I'm not sure that's a problem. can the login actually
      ever change for a running process?
    <pinotree> dunno
    <pinotree> but if so, it would be pointless to do the rpc every time
      instead of just once
    <antrik> pinotree: true
    * pinotree would just make it non-static and be safe
    <antrik> pinotree: well, one might argue that allocating a KiB of stack
      space is not very friendly, especially in a low-level library...
    <antrik> not sure what the general policy is about such things in libc