summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/open_issues/mondriaan_memory_protection.mdwn
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'open_issues/mondriaan_memory_protection.mdwn')
-rw-r--r--open_issues/mondriaan_memory_protection.mdwn85
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 85 deletions
diff --git a/open_issues/mondriaan_memory_protection.mdwn b/open_issues/mondriaan_memory_protection.mdwn
deleted file mode 100644
index 2c7b9ba1..00000000
--- a/open_issues/mondriaan_memory_protection.mdwn
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,85 +0,0 @@
-[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]]
-
-[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable
-id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this
-document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or
-any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant
-Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license
-is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation
-License|/fdl]]."]]"""]]
-
-<http://scale.eecs.berkeley.edu/mondriaan/>.
-
-
-# IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2013-07-02
-
- <xscript> in any case, what I wanted to check is if current hurd support
- PIE
- <xscript`> I just saw samuel posted some fixes to have PIE working in hurd
- <xscript`> are those included in the official image?
- <youpi> sure
- <youpi> it's just a trivial fixup in some address calculation code
- <xscript> youpi: nice
- <xscript> and does anyone know how complex would it be to implement some
- hackish support to have non-overlapping virtual addresses for
- applications supporting PIE?
- <braunr> not too difficult
- <xscript> really? I didn't expect such an answer XD
- <xscript> I'd like to have something similar to a SASOS
- <xscript> (single address space os)
- <braunr> ?
- <braunr> you mean an sasos on top of mach ?
- <xscript> yes, but only for a few apps I want to evaluate
- <braunr> i see
- <xscript> the optimal would be to have all of hurd's servers on that mode
- <braunr> you'l probably need to implement a small allocator but other than
- that it shouldn't be too hard, yes
- <braunr> uh ??
- <xscript> but running on 32 bits can be a problem here
- <braunr> and not hurdish at all
- <xscript> what's not hurdish?
- <braunr> we do want address space separation
- <xscript> well, you can have multiple address spaces (page tables), but
- without overlapping addresses between them
- <xscript> that's exactly what I'm looking for
- <braunr> sorry i don't see what you mean
- <braunr> if you run several servers in the same address space, they can
- corrupt each other
- <braunr> we don't want that
- <braunr> it's that simple
- <xscript> yes, sorry, I didn't explain myself
- <xscript> I want a separate address space on each server
- <xscript> but I want all memory allocations to be on addresses unique to
- the whole OS
- <braunr> that still doesn't make sense
- <xscript> well, it will still be secure
- <xscript> but I know it does not make sense per se
- <xscript> I want to do some experiments with a simulator
- <braunr> why do you want them non overlapping if they're separate ?
- <xscript> well, in my simulator I wouldn't need to change the page tables,
- protection is provided through other means
- <braunr> segmentation ?
- <xscript> that's one possibility
- <xscript> (small address spaces)
- <braunr> what do you have in mind ?
- <braunr> it wouldn't be on top of mach anyway then
- <braunr> mach implements paging
- <xscript> what I'm simulating is something of the likes of Mondriaan
- (http://www.cs.utexas.edu/~witchel/pubs/mmp-asplos2002.pdf)
- <xscript> paging is ok for me
- <braunr> 19:06 < xscript> well, in my simulator I wouldn't need to change
- the page tables, protection is provided through other means
- <braunr> it didn't sound so
- <xscript> I meant switching page tables (cr3, etc)
- <braunr> mach does that
- <xscript> I know, I know, I can just ignore that part for the moment
- <braunr> ok
- <xscript> for now, I'd like to morph hurd into a SASOS using one page table
- per process
- <xscript> I just wanted to know how hard that would be, without starting
- with a full dive into the code
- <xscript> there are other options (OSes, microkernels), but none of them
- provides as many readily-available applications as hurd
- <xscript> I suppose MINIX would also be easy to modify, but there's less
- apps there, and I also would like to tamper with MIG
- <xscript> I just wonder how hard it would be to modify MIG