summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/hurd/translator/ufs.mdwn
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'hurd/translator/ufs.mdwn')
-rw-r--r--hurd/translator/ufs.mdwn38
1 files changed, 38 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/hurd/translator/ufs.mdwn b/hurd/translator/ufs.mdwn
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..4d611e95
--- /dev/null
+++ b/hurd/translator/ufs.mdwn
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]]
+
+[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable
+id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this
+document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or
+any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant
+Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license
+is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation
+License|/fdl]]."]]"""]]
+
+The `ufs` translator supports some kind of the Unix File System. Beware, we're
+not aware of anybody having used/tested it in ages, so maybe it is very broken
+and will eat your data.
+
+
+# IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2013-08-30
+
+[[!tag open_issue_hurd]]
+
+ <Arne`> There might be a copyright problem: <nalaginrut> well, there seems
+ BSD-4clauses in the code:
+ http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/hurd/hurd.git/tree/ufs/alloc.c
+ <Arne`> braunr, tschwinge: Do you have any info on that? 4-clause BSD and
+ GPL on the same code are a license incompatibility…
+ <tschwinge> Arne`: I've put it onto my (long) TODO list.
+ <tschwinge> Easiest solution might be: rm -rf ufs.
+ <nalaginrut> will these affected code rewritten? or just modify license?
+ <mark_weaver> only the regents of the University of California could choose
+ to modify the license.
+ <youpi> nalaginrut: one can't modify a licence if one is not the author
+ <youpi> we can simply dump the code
+ <mark_weaver> s/author/owner/
+ <tschwinge> As I suppose ufs is unused/untested for a decade or so, I'd
+ have no issues with simply removing it from the tree, together with
+ ufs-fsck and ufs-utils.
+ <pinotree> tschwinge: or maybe extract the ufs stuff in an own repo, to be
+ imported as branch in incubator or own hurd/ufs.git?
+ <tschwinge> Sure, why not.