1 files changed, 0 insertions, 45 deletions
diff --git a/hurd/faq/slash_usr_symlink/discussion.mdwn b/hurd/faq/slash_usr_symlink/discussion.mdwn
deleted file mode 100644
index 219e14e4..00000000
--- a/hurd/faq/slash_usr_symlink/discussion.mdwn
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,45 +0,0 @@
-[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]]
-
-[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable
-id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this
-document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or
-any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant
-Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.  A copy of the license
-is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation
-License|/fdl]]."]]"""]]
-
-[[!tag open_issue_documentation]]
-
-
-# IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2012-02-01
-
-    <marcusb> I remember the time when we had a /usr symlink.  Now fedora 17
-      will move / to /usr and have /foo symlinks.  :)
-    <marcusb> braunr:
-      http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/TheCaseForTheUsrMerge
-    <marcusb> braunr: fedora and others are merging /bin, /sbin and some other
-      into /usr
-    <marcusb> braunr: back in 1998 we tried for two years or so to have /usr ->
-      ..  in Debian GNU/Hurd, but eventually we gave up on it, because it broke
-      some stuff
-    <gnu_srs> marcusb: Hi, which one is better (in your opinion): / or /usr?
-    <marcusb> gnu_srs: fedora says that using /usr allows better separation of
-      distribution files and machine-local files
-    <braunr> marcusb: won't it break remote /usr ?
-    <marcusb> so you can atomically mount the OS files to /usr
-    <marcusb> gnu_srs: but in the end, it's a wash
-    <marcusb> personally, I think every package should get its own directory
-    <braunr> marcusb: what PATH then ?
-    <marcusb> braunr: well, I guess you'd want to assemble a union filesystem
-      for a POSIX shell 
-    <braunr> marcusb: i don't see what you mean :/
-    <braunr> ah this comes from Lennart Poettering
-    <marcusb> braunr: check out for example how http://nixos.org/ does it
-    <manuel> braunr: something like, union /package1/bin /package2/bin
-      /package3/bin for /bin, /package1/lib /package2/lib /package3/lib for
-      /lib, etc. I guess
-    <braunr> manuel: would that scale well ?
-    <marcusb> the idea that there is only one correct binary for each program
-      with the name foo is noble, but a complete illusion that hides the
-      complexity of the actual configuration management task
-    <braunr> marcusb: right