diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'faq/old/old_hurd_faq.txt')
| -rw-r--r-- | faq/old/old_hurd_faq.txt | 63 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 63 deletions
diff --git a/faq/old/old_hurd_faq.txt b/faq/old/old_hurd_faq.txt index 4ebe019b..20b4c260 100644 --- a/faq/old/old_hurd_faq.txt +++ b/faq/old/old_hurd_faq.txt @@ -16,73 +16,10 @@ Original Document by: Derek Upham <upham@cs.ubc.ca> Contents: -Q0. Where can I get the Unofficial GNU Hurd FAQ? -Q2. Where can I get a copy? -Q3. Why bother writing a new OS when we have Linux and 386/BSD? Q4. What's all this about Mach 3.0 (and Mach 4.0)? -Q5. Where can I find more information? -Q7. What sort of machines will run Hurd in the future? -Q8. What is the current development status? -Q9. What sort of system would we have if the Hurd was bootable today? ============================== -Q0. Where can I get the Unofficial GNU Hurd FAQ? - -The Unofficial Hurd FAQ (what you are reading now) is occasionally -posted to the USENET newsgroup, gnu.misc.discuss. It is also -available from - - http://www.enci.ucalgary.ca/~gord/hurd/hurd-faq.txt (Broken Link ?) - -If you don't have WWW access, you may send mail to me, Gordon -Matzigkeit <gord@enci.ucalgary.ca> with a subject line that reads: - - Subject: send hurd-faq - -You should receive a PGP-signed copy of the current version of this -document in a matter of minutes. - - -Q2. Where can I get a copy? - -To put it simply, you can't. It is still under development (by -Michael Bushnell, Roland McGrath and Miles Bader). It is almost, but -not quite, at the point where you can do real work on it. Keep your -fingers crossed. - -Some people have actually bootstrapped it, but the work is not easy, -and the current snapshot won't work until a new multiserver boot -mechanism is made. - -If you *really* want to try it, beware that it is still pre-alpha -code, and that it will likely crash on you. See Trent Fisher's Hurd -pages (under question 5) for the latest information. - - -Q3. Why bother writing a new OS when we have Linux and 386/BSD? - -For one thing, Linux and BSD don't scale well. Hardware designers are -shifting more and more toward multiprocessor machines for performance, -and standard Unix kernels do not provide much multiprocessor support. -The Hurd, on the other hand, runs on top of the Mach 3.0 micro-kernel -[[1]] from CMU. Mach was designed precisely for multiprocessing -machines, so its portability should carry over nicely to the Hurd. - -In addition, the Hurd will be considerably more flexible and robust -than generic Unix. Wherever possible, Unix kernel features have been -moved into unprivileged space. Once there, anyone who desires can -develop custom replacements for them. Users will be able to write and -use their own file systems, their own `exec' servers, or their own -network protocols if they like, all without disturbing other users. - -The Linux kernel has now been modified to allow user-level file -systems, so there is proof that people will actually use features such -as these. It will be much easier to do under the Hurd, however, -because the Hurd is almost entirely run in user space and because the -various servers are designed for this sort of modification. - - Q4. What's all this about Mach 3.0 (and Mach 4.0)? As mentioned above, Mach is a micro-kernel, written at Carnegie Mellon |