summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--hurd/running/debian.mdwn56
1 files changed, 22 insertions, 34 deletions
diff --git a/hurd/running/debian.mdwn b/hurd/running/debian.mdwn
index c52fbf75..b758fd52 100644
--- a/hurd/running/debian.mdwn
+++ b/hurd/running/debian.mdwn
@@ -1,8 +1,11 @@
[[!meta title="Debian GNU/Hurd"]]
-# Debian Resources
-- Official page about the Debian GNU/Hurd port: [Debian GNU/Hurd](http://www.debian.org/ports/hurd/)
-- Debian [[FAQ]] — Frequently Asked Questions
+Debian GNU/Hurd is an effort to port the Debian distribution to the Hurd. Around 75% of Debian packages can already be run under Debian GNU/Hurd, which makes it very usable. See the [[Status]] of the Debian port for more information.
+
+<!-- I don't know what it means that /etc/mtab -> /proc/mounts, but this is what I could interpret.
+ It was simply a line (h1, for some reason, on this page and it looked out of place. Correct or even delete this if it makes no sense -->
+
+One noteable difference in this port, is that `/etc/mtab` -> `/proc/mounts`
## QEMU Image
[[!inline pages=hurd/running/debian/qemu_image raw=yes feeds=no]]
@@ -17,23 +20,11 @@
* [[Patch_submission]] — How to submit patches for build failures
- [[Creating_image_tarball]]
-# Additional Information
-- [Presentation](http://people.debian.org/~mbanck/talks/hurd_lt2004/html/)
- *Debian GNU/Hurd*, [[MichaelBanck]], LinuxTag 2004 Karlsruhe
-- [[Status]]
-- [Archive Qualification](http://wiki.debian.org/ArchiveQualification/hurd-i386)
-
-
-# `/etc/mtab` -> `/proc/mounts`
-
## IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2014-02-12
<braunr> hm, there is something weird
- <braunr> after successfully installing (with the new installer cd), and
- rebooting, system init fails because fsck can't be run on /home (a
- separate partition)
- <braunr> it can't fsck because at that point, /home is already mounted, and
- indeed the translator is running
+ <braunr> after successfully installing (with the new installer cd), and rebooting, system init fails because fsck can't be run on /home (a separate partition)
+ <braunr> it can't fsck because at that point, /home is already mounted, and indeed the translator is running
<braunr> teythoon: any idea what might cause that ?
<teythoon> me ?
<teythoon> no
@@ -52,30 +43,24 @@
<teythoon> i believe they dropped that
<youpi> err, but something must be creating it for newer systems
<teythoon> good point
- <braunr> well, except for these small details, everything went pretty
- smooth
+ <braunr> well, except for these small details, everything went pretty smooth
<braunr> both on ide and ahci
<youpi> it seems /etc/mtab gets created at boot
<youpi> (on Linux I mean)
- <teythoon> youpi: i cannot find the init script, but i'm sure that it was
- there
+ <teythoon> youpi: i cannot find the init script, but i'm sure that it was there
<youpi> I can't find it either on the installed system...
<azeem> maybe pere or rleigh in #debian-hurd can help
## IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2014-02-13
- <braunr> 6<--60(pid1698)->dir_lookup ("var/run/mtab" 4194305 0) = 0 3
- "/run/mtab" (null)
+ <braunr> 6<--60(pid1698)->dir_lookup ("var/run/mtab" 4194305 0) = 0 3 "/run/mtab" (null)
<braunr> looks like /etc/mtab isn't actually used anymore
<teythoon> it never was on hurd
<tomodach1> braunr: well it is generated i believe from mounted filesystems
- <tomodach1> if its still around there is a reason for it, like posix
- compatiblity perhaps?
- <braunr> well the problem is that, as mentioned in pere's thread on
- bug-hurd, some tools now expect /var/run/mtab instead of /etc/mtab
- <braunr> and since nothing currently creates this file, these tools, such
- as df, are lost
+ <tomodach1> if its still around there is a reason for it, like posix compatiblity perhaps?
+ <braunr> well the problem is that, as mentioned in pere's thread on bug-hurd, some tools now expect /var/run/mtab instead of /etc/mtab
+ <braunr> and since nothing currently creates this file, these tools, such as df, are lost
<braunr> they can't find the info they're looking for
@@ -87,11 +72,14 @@
<pere> yes. I recommended fixing it in the hurd package. (BTS #737759)
<braunr> yes i saw but was there any action taken ?
<pere> did not check
- <teythoon> i thought youpi mentioned that it is fixed in the libc and we
- just need to rebuild coreutils or something
+ <teythoon> i thought youpi mentioned that it is fixed in the libc and we just need to rebuild coreutils or something
<pere> yes
<braunr> oh ok
<braunr> but doesn't that mean it will use /etc/mtab ?
- <pere> if I was a hurd porter, I would fix it in hurd while waiting for a
- fix in coreutils, just to save people for wondering about the breakage,
- but I am not the most patient of developers. :)
+ <pere> if I was a hurd porter, I would fix it in hurd while waiting for a fix in coreutils, just to save people for wondering about the breakage, but I am not the most patient of developers. :)
+
+# Externel
+* Official page about the Debian GNU/Hurd port: [Debian GNU/Hurd](http://www.debian.org/ports/hurd/)
+* Debian [[FAQ]] — Frequently Asked Questions
+* [Presentation](http://people.debian.org/~mbanck/talks/hurd_lt2004/html/) -Debian GNU/Hurd*, [[MichaelBanck]], LinuxTag 2004 Karlsruhe
+* [Archive Qualification](http://wiki.debian.org/ArchiveQualification/hurd-i386)