diff options
| author | Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org> | 2015-02-18 00:58:35 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org> | 2015-02-18 00:58:35 +0100 |
| commit | 49a086299e047b18280457b654790ef4a2e5abfa (patch) | |
| tree | c2b29e0734d560ce4f58c6945390650b5cac8a1b /service_solahart_jakarta_selatan__082122541663/libdiskfs_dot_dot-dot_relevant_for_libnetfs.mdwn | |
| parent | e2b3602ea241cd0f6bc3db88bf055bee459028b6 (diff) | |
Revert "rename open_issues.mdwn to service_solahart_jakarta_selatan__082122541663.mdwn"
This reverts commit 95878586ec7611791f4001a4ee17abf943fae3c1.
Diffstat (limited to 'service_solahart_jakarta_selatan__082122541663/libdiskfs_dot_dot-dot_relevant_for_libnetfs.mdwn')
| -rw-r--r-- | service_solahart_jakarta_selatan__082122541663/libdiskfs_dot_dot-dot_relevant_for_libnetfs.mdwn | 20 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 20 deletions
diff --git a/service_solahart_jakarta_selatan__082122541663/libdiskfs_dot_dot-dot_relevant_for_libnetfs.mdwn b/service_solahart_jakarta_selatan__082122541663/libdiskfs_dot_dot-dot_relevant_for_libnetfs.mdwn deleted file mode 100644 index 1e4a6acb..00000000 --- a/service_solahart_jakarta_selatan__082122541663/libdiskfs_dot_dot-dot_relevant_for_libnetfs.mdwn +++ /dev/null @@ -1,20 +0,0 @@ -[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]] - -[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable -id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this -document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or -any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant -Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license -is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation -License|/fdl]]."]]"""]] - -[[!tag open_issue_hurd]] - -IRC, unknown channel, unknown date. - - <tschwinge> By the way: your libdiskfs ., .. fix -- is that relevant for libnetfs as well? (Didn't look it up so far.) - <youpi> it could be a good idea to protect netfs users directly from there yes - <tschwinge> But probably the backend (e.g., NFS server) would protect us in the netfs case, right? - <youpi> possibly, but we could have locking issues in between like in libdiskfs - <youpi> and POSIX says it's invalid anyway - <youpi> so we'd probably better just forbid it |