|author||Samuel Thibault <email@example.com>||2015-02-18 00:58:35 +0100|
|committer||Samuel Thibault <firstname.lastname@example.org>||2015-02-18 00:58:35 +0100|
Revert "rename open_issues.mdwn to service_solahart_jakarta_selatan__082122541663.mdwn"
This reverts commit 95878586ec7611791f4001a4ee17abf943fae3c1.
Diffstat (limited to 'open_issues/ext2fs_dtime.mdwn')
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/open_issues/ext2fs_dtime.mdwn b/open_issues/ext2fs_dtime.mdwn
new file mode 100644
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2010, 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]]
+[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable
+id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this
+document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or
+any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant
+Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license
+is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation
+ /dev/hd0s1: Deleted inode 95849 has zero dtime. FIXED.
+This is actually sorta benign. What typically happens is that one upgrades e.g.
+a library, and there are still some processes using it (e.g. because it's libc).
+The library file is thus kept on the filesystem, so as to be able to load parts
+of it on demand. The file is thus marked as deleted, but the deletion hasn't
+been effective yet, thus dtime being zero. e2fsck notices this and finishes
+deleting the file. To really fix this, we would probably have to really unmount