summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/hurd/translator/ext2fs.mdwn
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorThomas Schwinge <tschwinge@gnu.org>2012-07-11 22:39:59 +0200
committerThomas Schwinge <tschwinge@gnu.org>2012-07-11 22:39:59 +0200
commit8cee055ec4fac00e59f19620ab06e2b30dccee3c (patch)
tree6cd7ca1b8ce7eba1820fdbd31ee5755ed33dabe2 /hurd/translator/ext2fs.mdwn
parentb75e038615d51cb62c200e336e59202519db8cae (diff)
IRC.
Diffstat (limited to 'hurd/translator/ext2fs.mdwn')
-rw-r--r--hurd/translator/ext2fs.mdwn44
1 files changed, 44 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/hurd/translator/ext2fs.mdwn b/hurd/translator/ext2fs.mdwn
index ad79c7b9..8e15d1c7 100644
--- a/hurd/translator/ext2fs.mdwn
+++ b/hurd/translator/ext2fs.mdwn
@@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ License|/fdl]]."]]"""]]
* [[Page_cache]]
+ * [[metadata_caching]]
+
## Large Stores
@@ -43,6 +45,48 @@ Smaller block sizes are commonly automatically selected by `mke2fs` when using
small backend stores, like floppy devices.
+#### IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2012-06-30
+
+ <braunr> at least having the same api in the debian package and the git
+ source would be great (in reference to the large store patch ofc)
+ <youpi> braunr: the api part could be merged perhaps
+ <youpi> it's very small apparently
+ <antrik> braunr: the large store patch is a sad story. when it was first
+ submitted, one of the maintainers raised some concerns. the other didn't
+ share these (don't remember who is who), but the concerned one never
+ followed up with details. so it has been in limbo ever since. tschwinge
+ once promised to take it up, but didn't get around to it so far. plus,
+ the original author himself mentioned once that he didn't consider it
+ finished...
+ <youpi> antrik: it's clearly not finished
+ <youpi> there are XXXs here and there
+ <braunr> it's called an RC1 and RC2 is mentioned in the release notes
+ <antrik> youpi: well, that doesn't stop most other projects from commiting
+ stuff... including most emphatically the original Hurd code :-)
+ <youpi> what do you refer to my "that" ? :)
+ <braunr> "XXX"
+ <youpi> right
+ <youpi> at the time it made sense to delay applying
+ <youpi> but I guess by nowadays standard we should just as well commit it
+ <youpi> it works enough for Debian, already
+ <youpi> there is just one bug I nkow about
+ <youpi> the apt database file keeps haveing the wrong size, fixed by e2fsck
+ <pinotree> youpi: remember that patch should be fixed in the offset
+ declaration in diskfs.h
+ <youpi> I don't remember about that
+ <youpi> did we fix it in the debian package?
+ <pinotree> nope
+ <youpi> you had issues when fixing it, didn't you?
+ <youpi> (I don't remember where I can find the details about this)
+ <pinotree> i changed it, recompiled hurd and installed it, started a perl
+ rebuild and when running one of the two lfs tests it hard locked the vm
+ after ext2fs was taking 100% cpu for a bit
+ <pinotree> i don't exclude i could have done something stupid on my side
+ though
+ <youpi> or there could just be actual issues, uncovered here
+ <youpi> which can be quite probable
+
+
# Documentation
* <http://e2fsprogs.sourceforge.net/ext2.html>