IRC.

2 files changed, 34 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/faq/how_many_developers/discussion.mdwn b/faq/how_many_developers/discussion.mdwn
index 6ca47c9a..8e4c487a 100644
--- a/faq/how_many_developers/discussion.mdwn
+++ b/faq/how_many_developers/discussion.mdwn
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]]
+[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2011, 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]]
 
 [[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable
 id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.  A copy of the license
 is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation
 License|/fdl]]."]]"""]]
 
+
 # IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2011-05-22
 
     <silver_hook> Since apparently Hurd's aim is a very stable and transparent
@@ -59,3 +60,6 @@ License|/fdl]]."]]"""]]
     <antrik> the Hurd doesn't almost work for anyone
     <antrik> actually, you should probably reread the whole paper. it's
       essentially an analysis why the Hurd failed compared to Linux
+
+
+# [[open_issues/mission_statement]]
diff --git a/faq/which_microkernel/discussion.mdwn b/faq/which_microkernel/discussion.mdwn
index 7ea131e9..ffdc6720 100644
--- a/faq/which_microkernel/discussion.mdwn
+++ b/faq/which_microkernel/discussion.mdwn
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]]
+[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2011, 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]]
 
 [[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable
 id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this
@@ -50,13 +50,15 @@ All in all, I still think my text was better. If you have any conerns with it,
 please discuss them...
 
 
-# IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2011-09-27
+# seL4
+
+## IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2011-09-27
 
     <cjuner> Does anyone remember/know if/why not seL4 was considered for
       hurd-l4? Is anyone aware of any differences between seL4 and coyotos?
 
 
-## 2011-09-28
+## IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2011-09-29
 
     <antrik> cjuner: the seL4 project was only at the beginning when the
       decision was made. so was Coyotos, but Shapiro promised back then that
@@ -92,3 +94,27 @@ please discuss them...
       matters to take away anything useful from more detail ;-) )
     <antrik> I could try to explain the issues I mentioned for Coyotos (as far
       as I understand them), but would that really help you?
+
+
+# Xnu (Darwin)
+
+
+## IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2012-03-30
+
+    <mel__> did people consider to port Hurd to Darwin? i.e. replace GNU Mach
+      with Darwin?
+    <braunr> no
+    <braunr> well, quickly only
+    <mel__> wouldn't it be a reasonable idea?
+    <mel__> after all, Darwin is production-ready and contains a Mach side.
+    <braunr> not more than fixing gnumach itself, or using linux instead
+    <mel__> well.
+    <braunr> those implementations have diverged with time
+    <mel__> i see
+    <mel__> the fsf should pay people for fixing gnu mach then. :)
+    <antrik> mel__: indeed someone consided Xnu (the actual kernel of Darwin) a
+      while back; but I think he shelved the idea again. not sure about the
+      exact reasons
+    <antrik> Xnu implements a few improvements that might be helpful; but it
+      doesn't address the really fundamental issues that matter for a true
+      multiserver system...