path: root/faq/how_many_developers/discussion.mdwn
diff options
authorThomas Schwinge <>2011-07-15 22:46:18 +0200
committerThomas Schwinge <>2011-07-15 22:46:18 +0200
commit1c8909017d006c8e4afeea6d1a1efdebe26fc6b0 (patch)
treebe08ebd9bc0d86298189bbaa449640d60c2e8ad7 /faq/how_many_developers/discussion.mdwn
parent4b50d974c3cca89a154704b01857790daf98e4d3 (diff)
Diffstat (limited to 'faq/how_many_developers/discussion.mdwn')
1 files changed, 20 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/faq/how_many_developers/discussion.mdwn b/faq/how_many_developers/discussion.mdwn
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9fc44f2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/faq/how_many_developers/discussion.mdwn
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]]
+[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable
+id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this
+document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or
+any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant
+Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license
+is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation
+IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2011-07-09
+ <antrik> gnu_srs1: regarding your question why people aren't interested in
+ workin on Hurd: Eric Raymond explains it pretty well in his famous
+ "Cathedral and Bazaar" paper
+ <antrik> people are more likely to work on something that *almost* works
+ for them, and where they only have to fill in a few missing bits
+ <antrik> the Hurd doesn't almost work for anyone
+ <antrik> actually, you should probably reread the whole paper. it's
+ essentially an analysis why the Hurd failed compared to Linux