This page is meant to give some guidelines. Please use good sense or ask on bug-hurd if there are any questions.
Git repositories on Savannah
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/hurd
- hurd.git -- Hurd meta package; no real content yet
- hurd/glibc.git -- glibc maintenance
- hurd/gnumach.git -- GNU Mach (building)
- hurd/hurd.git -- Hurd (building)
- hurd/incubator.git -- the great next stuff
- hurd/libpthread.git -- POSIX threading library
- hurd/mig.git -- MIG (building)
- hurd/procfs.git -- procfs
- hurd/unionfs.git -- unionfs
- hurd/viengoos.git -- Viengoos (building)
- hurd/web.git -- Web pages
These are mirrored on https://git.sceen.net/hurd/, which may provide faster anonymous accesses.
IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2013-11-04
<teythoon> btw, why did you remove the savannah mirror stuff?
<braunr> there is a bug somewhere
<braunr> that is triggered by the glibc repository
<braunr> because a git pack file is too large
<braunr> i moved them to git.sceen.net
<teythoon> ok
Branches
Members of the Hurd Savannah group are allowed to create branches without formal permission:
- named
SAVANNAH_LOGIN/BASE_BRANCH[-TOPIC]
orSAVANNAH_LOGIN/TOPIC/BASE_BRANCH
for private general-purpose or topic branches, respectively, or - named
BASE_BRANCH-TOPIC
orTOPIC/BASE_BRANCH
for public topic branches basing onBASE_BRANCH
.
TOPIC
shall be a suitable tag describing the branch's main concern. These
tags can be applied recursively (TOPIC/SUBTOPIC/BASE_BRANCH
, like
pfinet_rewrite/use_lwIP/master
, for example).
private vs. public does, of course, in this scenario not mean visibility
(all branches are externally visible),
but instead authority: private branches are those that the user
SAVANNAH_LOGIN
has authority over, whereas public branches are open for
every committer to install changes on. The private branches are those that you
would typically host on your own machine and publish through your own web
server, but we offer that you can instead do this from the centralized Savannah
repository, as a number of people don't have an always-accessible web server
running on their own machines.
Subprojects
Some repositories hold a bunch of independent subprojects, first and foremost the incubator repository.
Even though we've been doing differently in the past, branches in there shall be named like this:
SUBPROJECT/master
for themaster
branch;SUBPROJECT/SAVANNAH_LOGIN/BASE_BRANCH[-TOPIC]
orSUBPROJECT/SAVANNAH_LOGIN/TOPIC/BASE_BRANCH
for private general-purpose or topic branches, respectively, orSUBPROJECT/BASE_BRANCH-TOPIC
orSUBPROJECT/TOPIC/BASE_BRANCH
for public topic branches basing onSUBPROJECT/BASE_BRANCH
.
That is, we introduce a top-level SUBPROJECT
hierarchy, where distinct
per-subproject Git repositories could have been used instead.
Examples
GNU Mach
master
-- the mainline branchmaster-oskit
-- port to OSKit; branched off ofmaster
at some pointmaster-gdb_stubs
-- add support for GDB stubs; branched off ofmaster
at some point
libpthread
master
-- the mainline branchmaster-viengoos
-- port to Viengoos; branched off ofmaster
at some pointmaster-viengoos-on-bare-metal
-- port to Viengoos running on bare metal; branched off ofmaster-viengoos
at some point
incubator
master
-- not to be usedtarfs/master
--master
branch of thetarfs
subproject
unionfs
master
-- the mainline branchmaster-unionmount
-- developunionmount
based onunionfs
' master branch
To give a concrete example, the latter one was created like this:
$ git clone --no-checkout ssh://git.savannah.gnu.org/srv/git/hurd/unionfs.git
$ cd unionfs/
$ git checkout -b master-unionmount origin/master
$ ...
$ git push master-unionmount
Merging
Merging between Git branches is trivial, at least as long as no conflicts arise.
Due to this, you are encouraged to freely make use of separate branches for different working topics, as this really faciliates concentrating on one specific working topic.
You are encouraged to regularely merge from the respective mainline branches
(BASE_BRANCH
; should be master
in most cases) into your working branches,
and ensure that your modifications are still fine in the context of new
mainline changes.
Merging from working branches into the mainline branches will usually be done by one of the project administrators, unless negotiated otherwise. For this to happen, the copyright of your changes has to be assigned to the Free Software Foundation; read about the copyright assignment process.
It is explicitly encouraged to merge changes from working branches into the mainline branches (as opposed to rebase them on top), as the former mode easily allows to determine the context under which a patch has been developed.
Tags
Equivalent rules apply.
Behavior
Try to not introduce spurious, unneeded changes, e.g., whitespace changes.
Adhere to the coding conventions that are already used. These are usually the GNU Coding Standards for stuff written by ourselves, including new files, of course.
GNU Mach code is largely based on external code. Don't GNU-ify it, as this would make merging external patches unnecessarily difficult.
Commit messages
We no longer maintain parallel ChangeLog
and commit messages. When needed,
the ChangeLog
files can be created automatically from the commit messages.
Commit messages have this mandatory format:
One-line summary.
Blank line.
ChangeLog-like list of changes, but without leading tabs.
The header line of each former ChangeLog
snippet (DATE NAME EMAIL) is no
longer to be included in the commit message, and instead the author and
committer of a change, together with the dates, will be maintained natively by
Git.
Example:
commit 3054666a46e0142cacef895c13edb4391435c722
Author: Some One <someone@example.com>
AuthorDate: Thu Jun 11 15:59:55 2005 +0000
Commit: Some One <someone@example.com>
CommitDate: Thu Jun 11 15:59:55 2005 +0000
Frobnicate the foo.
* frob.c (foo): Frob it.
* oldfoo.c [OLD] (oldfoo): Likewise.
[OLD_OLD_FOO] (oofoo): Permute every second word with itself, and
beginning with the tenth line, every third one also. Pure
nonsense.
Read about how to write GNU-style ChangeLog
messages.
Don't waste time writing exhaustive ChangeLog
-like commit messages for, e.g.,
debugging stuff that will be removed again before merging your development
branch into the mainline. Sometimes the one-line summary might already
suffice. But please do write something.
Behavior on private branches
Even though you are said to be the owner of branches tagged with your
SAVANNAH_LOGIN
, it is generally nevertheless good to not do history-rewriting
stuff and the like (git rebase
and friends), as others may in turn be basing
their work on your private branches.
We could establish a branch-tagging policy for branches that others should
expect their history possibly to be rewritten. This may be useful for branches
that are only meant for aggregating the changes of (several) development
branches, like an imaginary
rewrite_pfinet/for_master_and_proposed_for_general_testing
branch.
Git repositories on darnassus
darnassus is
configured in a way so that users
can publish Git repositories by creating in /var/lib/git/
symlinks to
repositories residing in their home directories. (Due to disk space
constraints, do not put repositories directly into /var/lib/git/
.) All
repositories in /var/lib/git/
are automatically exported. A web interface
(that also lists URLs for accessing the repositories using the git
and http
protocols) is available at http://darnassus.sceen.net/cgit/.
Git repositories on flubber
flubber is
configured in a way so that users
can publish Git repositories from their home directories. The only thing to do
is to put an empty .git/git-daemon-export-ok
(cf. git daemon's manual
page) into
the repository, or just git-daemon-export-ok
for
bare
repositories.
For example, Thomas Schwinge has a checkout of
libpthread in ~tschwinge/tmp/hurd/libpthread/
, the
~tschwinge/tmp/hurd/libpthread/.git/git-daemon-export-ok
file exists. If you
really need to, you can clone it like this:
$ git clone git://flubber.bddebian.com/~tschwinge/tmp/hurd/libpthread
Debian Git repositories
IRC, #hurd, 2010-07-31
<tschwinge> git-buildpackage is to be used to build these new Debian repositories, I guess?
<youpi> well, the Vcs-Git control header is about everything people need to know, I believe :)
<youpi> git-buildpackage is just mostly an easy way to build the .orig.tar.Gz from the tag
<youpi> http://honk.sigxcpu.org/projects/git-buildpackage/manual-html/gbp.html