IRC, unknwon channel, unknown date. <tschwinge> scolobb: In wiki edit 60accafa79f645ae61b578403f7fc0c11914b725 I see that you intend(ed) to use syslog for logging debug messages. I thought I'd point you to http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2007-02/msg00042.html -- no idea if that's still an issue or what went wrong at that time. Perhaps you can have a look? <scolobb> tschwinge: Thanks for information! Currently I'm logging some debug messages to a simple file, but I'll now check whether the issue you've pointed out is still present. <scolobb> tschwinge: I am getting absolutely abnormal results: when I call syslog() from a simple C program for the first time, the message goes to the system log. However, any further calls to syslog() do just nothing... I am able to send something to syslog only after reboot (it doesn't help if I restart syslogd). IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2011-08-08 < pinotree> wow, `logger` + a simple C udp server can cause havoc < pinotree> youpi: ever seen something like http://paste.debian.net/hidden/72cf4b77/ ? < pinotree> and then also other servers (like pflocal, pfinet, few more) start becoming crazy (using 100% cpu) < youpi> nope < pinotree> iirc in one of the few tries i got the message "Resource lost." from the closed ssh connection < pinotree> i was trying to see why syslog doesn't work, but this basically surprised me... < pinotree> oh, i found an apparently working syslog daemon < pinotree> dsyslog < gg0> have you tried syslog-ng? IIRC it writes in /var/log/messages by default. < pinotree> yeah, it seems to stop receiving messages are few < pinotree> gg0: are you using syslog-ng? < gg0> pinotree: I should fire hurd vm up. I seem I kept dirty-patched busybox syslog, I don't even know if it works, at least it starts http://bugs.debian.org/636162 < pinotree> maintainer said "not really" < gg0> well, if all other syslogs use shm and sems, they won't work too, right? < youpi> shm should work with the latest libc < youpi> what won't is sysv sem < youpi> (i.e. semget) IRC, OFTC, #debian-hurd, 2011-11-02: * pinotree sighs at #645790 :/ <tschwinge> pinotree: W.r.t. 645790 -- yeah, ``someone'' should finally figure out what's going on with syslog. http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2008-07/msg00152.html <tschwinge> pinotree: And this... http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2007-02/msg00042.html <pinotree> tschwinge: i did that 20 invocations tests recently, and basically none of them has been logged <pinotree> tschwinge: when i started playing with logger more, as result i had some server that started taking all the cpu, followed by other servers and in the end my ssh connection were dropped and i had nothing to do (not even login from console) <tschwinge> pinotree: Sounds like ``fun''. Hopefully we can manage to understand (and fix the underlying issue) why a simple syslog() invocation can make the whole system instable. <pinotree> tschwinge: to be honest, i got havoc in the system when i told syslog to manually look for /dev/log (-u /dev/log), possibly alao when telling to use a datagram socket (-d) <pinotree> but even if a normal syslog() invocation does not cause havoc, there's still the "lost messages" issue <tschwinge> Yep. What I've been doing ever since, is deinstall all *syslog* packages. <tschwinge> This ``fixed'' all syslog() hangs.