[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]] [[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation License|/fdl]]."]]"""]] [[!taglink open_issue_documentation]] A bunch of this should also be covered in other (introductionary) material, like Bushnell's Hurd paper. All this should be unfied and streamlined. IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2011-03-08 <foocraft> I've a question on what are the "units" in the hurd project, if you were to divide them into units if they aren't, and what are the dependency relations between those units(roughly, nothing too pedantic for now) <antrik> there is GNU Mach (the microkernel); there are the server libraries in the Hurd package; there are the actual servers in the same; and there is the POSIX implementation layer in glibc <antrik> relations are a bit tricky <antrik> Mach is the base layer which implements IPC and memory management <foocraft> hmm I'll probably allocate time for dependency graph generation, in the worst case <antrik> on top of this, the Hurd servers, using the server libraries, implement various aspects of the system functionality <antrik> client programs use libc calls to use the servers <antrik> (servers also use libc to communicate with other servers and/or Mach though) <foocraft> so every server depends solely on mach, and no other server? <foocraft> s/mach/mach and/or libc/ <antrik> I think these things should be pretty clear one you are somewhat familiar with the Hurd architecture... nothing really tricky there <antrik> no <antrik> servers often depend on other servers for certain functionality --- IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2011-03-12 <dEhiN> when mach first starts up, does it have some basic i/o or fs functionality built into it to start up the initial hurd translators? <antrik> I/O is presently completely in Mach <antrik> filesystems are in userspace <antrik> the root filesystem and exec server are loaded by grub <dEhiN> o I see <dEhiN> so in order to start hurd, you would have to start mach and simultaneously start the root filesystem and exec server? <antrik> not exactly <antrik> GRUB loads all three, and then starts Mach. Mach in turn starts the servers according to the multiboot information passed from GRUB <dEhiN> ok, so does GRUB load them into ram? <dEhiN> I'm trying to figure out in my mind how hurd is initially started up from a low-level pov <antrik> yes, as I said, GRUB loads them <dEhiN> ok, thanks antrik...I'm new to the idea of microkernels, but a veteran of monolithic kernels <dEhiN> although I just learned that windows nt is a hybrid kernel which I never knew! <rm> note there's a /hurd/ext2fs.static <rm> I belive that's what is used initially... right? <antrik> yes <antrik> loading the shared libraries in addition to the actual server would be unweildy <antrik> so the root FS server is linked statically instead <dEhiN> what does the root FS server do? <antrik> well, it serves the root FS ;-) <antrik> it also does some bootstrapping work during startup, to bring the rest of the system up