From 31197ac55a5f93e8c5ad44d9a86fe0d62e0ab424 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Schwinge Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 21:35:26 +0100 Subject: is the new . --- user/jkoenig/java/discussion.mdwn | 3 +++ user/jkoenig/java/proposal.mdwn | 2 +- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'user/jkoenig/java') diff --git a/user/jkoenig/java/discussion.mdwn b/user/jkoenig/java/discussion.mdwn index 352f6d62..a95b2cbe 100644 --- a/user/jkoenig/java/discussion.mdwn +++ b/user/jkoenig/java/discussion.mdwn @@ -203,6 +203,9 @@ Probably faster than JNI, but only usable with GCJ. right, so here you may want to look at the UML class diagram from http://www.bddebian.com/~hurd-web/user/jkoenig/java/proposal/ + +[[proposal]]. + so in the C case, mig generates 3 files a header file which has the prototypes of the mig-generated stubs, diff --git a/user/jkoenig/java/proposal.mdwn b/user/jkoenig/java/proposal.mdwn index feb7e9dc..61563c95 100644 --- a/user/jkoenig/java/proposal.mdwn +++ b/user/jkoenig/java/proposal.mdwn @@ -588,7 +588,7 @@ In the event multiple language bindings projects would be accepted, some work could probably be done in common. In particular, -[ArneBab](http://www.bddebian.com/~hurd-web/community/weblogs/ArneBab/2011-04-06-application-pyhurd/) +[[ArneBab|/community/weblogs/ArneBab/2011-04-06-application-pyhurd]] seems to favor a low-level approach for his Python bindings as I do for Java, and I would be happy to discuss API design and coordinate MIG changes with him. I would also have an extra month after the end of the GSoC period -- cgit v1.2.3