From 95878586ec7611791f4001a4ee17abf943fae3c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "https://me.yahoo.com/a/g3Ccalpj0NhN566pHbUl6i9QF0QEkrhlfPM-#b1c14" Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 20:08:03 +0100 Subject: rename open_issues.mdwn to service_solahart_jakarta_selatan__082122541663.mdwn --- .../runit.mdwn | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+) create mode 100644 service_solahart_jakarta_selatan__082122541663/runit.mdwn (limited to 'service_solahart_jakarta_selatan__082122541663/runit.mdwn') diff --git a/service_solahart_jakarta_selatan__082122541663/runit.mdwn b/service_solahart_jakarta_selatan__082122541663/runit.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 00000000..659b81ea --- /dev/null +++ b/service_solahart_jakarta_selatan__082122541663/runit.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@ +[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2008, 2009, 2011 Free Software Foundation, +Inc."]] + +[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable +id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this +document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or +any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant +Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license +is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation +License|/fdl]]."]]"""]] + +[[!tag open_issue_porting]] + +The `runit` package doesn't work, even its test suite doesn't finish. + +[[Thomas_Schwinge|tschwinge]] once was having a look at that, but this very +report is just from his memory, and his memory is dim... The problem *might* +either be a time stamping issue (which might be fixed by now) or it *might* be +the `select` call failing issue we're seeing from time to time. Or something +else. + +[[Harish Badrinath|harishbadrinath]] +Originally answered by Samuel Thibault: +> 120->proc_dostop_request ( 138) = 0 +> +> + +Usual issue with rpctrace: it does not support fork(). + + I've checked a backtrace in gdb, got this: + + 0x0105af6c in mach_msg_trap () + at /build/eglibc-jWVnRE/eglibc-2.13/build-tree/hurd-i386-libc/mach/mach_msg_trap.S:2 + 1 0x0105b769 in __mach_msg (msg=0x1024af8, option=258, send_size=0, rcv_size=40, rcv_name=140, + timeout=1000020, notify=0) at msg.c:110 + 2 0x01062251 in _hurd_select (nfds=2, pollfds=0x1024dc0, readfds=0x0, writefds=0x0, exceptfds=0x0, + timeout=0x1024bbc, sigmask=0x0) at hurdselect.c:324 + 3 0x0114427b in __poll (fds=0x1024dc0, nfds=2, timeout=1000020) at ../sysdeps/mach/hurd/poll.c:48 + 4 0x0804b770 in iopause (x=0x1024dc0, len=2, deadline=0x1024dd8, stamp=0x1024de8) at iopause.c:29 + 5 0x08048efc in main (argc=2, argv=0x1024e94) at runsv.c:543 + + and main() shows up as: + + sig_unblock(sig_term); + sig_unblock(sig_child); + -> iopause(x, 2 +haslog, &deadline, &now); + sig_block(sig_term); + sig_block(sig_child); + +So it simply looks like the known "signals don't interrupt select" bug. -- cgit v1.2.3