From 6ccb3e0f305bc869c907477b97c95bcbc938bc32 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Schwinge Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:17:48 +0200 Subject: Reformatting. --- rules/source_repositories.mdwn | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) (limited to 'rules') diff --git a/rules/source_repositories.mdwn b/rules/source_repositories.mdwn index ad488ebf..044cf6ce 100644 --- a/rules/source_repositories.mdwn +++ b/rules/source_repositories.mdwn @@ -17,17 +17,17 @@ for *hurd*). Members of the [[Hurd_Savannah_group|savannah_group]] are allowed to create branches without formal permission: - * named *BASE_BRANCH-SAVANNAH_LOGIN[-TOPIC]* for private general-purpose or + * named `BASE_BRANCH-SAVANNAH_LOGIN[-TOPIC]` for private general-purpose or topic branches, respectively, or - * named *BASE_BRANCH-TOPIC* for public topic branches basing on - *BASE_BRANCH*. + * named `BASE_BRANCH-TOPIC` for public topic branches basing on + `BASE_BRANCH`. -*TOPIC* shall be a suitable tag describing the branch's main concern. These -tags can be applied recursively (*TOPIC-SUBTOPIC-SUBSUBTOPIC*). +`TOPIC` shall be a suitable tag describing the branch's main concern. These +tags can be applied recursively (`TOPIC-SUBTOPIC-SUBSUBTOPIC`). *private* vs. *public* does, of course, in this scenario not mean visibility, but instead authority: *private* branches are those that the user -*SAVANNAH_LOGIN* has authority over, whereas public branches are open for +`SAVANNAH_LOGIN` has authority over, whereas public branches are open for every committer to install changes on. The private branches are those that you would typically host on your own machine and publish through your own web server, but we offer that you can instead do this from the centralized Savannah @@ -38,18 +38,18 @@ Examples: * GNU Mach - * *master* -- the mainline branch - * *master-oskit* -- port to OSKit; branched off of *master* at some point - * *master-gdb_stubs* -- add support for GDB stubs; branched off of - *master* at some point + * `master` -- the mainline branch + * `master-oskit` -- port to OSKit; branched off of `master` at some point + * `master-gdb_stubs` -- add support for GDB stubs; branched off of + `master` at some point * libpthread - * *master* -- the mainline branch - * *master-viengoos* -- port to Viengoos; branched off of *master* at some + * `master` -- the mainline branch + * `master-viengoos` -- port to Viengoos; branched off of `master` at some point - * *master-viengoos-on-bare-metal* -- port to Viengoos running on bare - metal; branched off of *master-viengoos* at some point + * `master-viengoos-on-bare-metal` -- port to Viengoos running on bare + metal; branched off of `master-viengoos` at some point ## Merging @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ different working topics, as this really faciliates concentrating on one specific working topic. You are encouraged to regularely merge from the respective mainline branches -(*BASE_BRANCH*; should be *master* in most cases) into your working branches, +(`BASE_BRANCH`; should be `master` in most cases) into your working branches, and ensure that your modifications are still fine in the context of new mainline changes. @@ -82,31 +82,31 @@ Equivalent rules apply. Usually, branches are to be eventually merged back into their respective mainline branches. To faciliate (and also to help other contributors) we'd like you to write a short summary log in a top-level (or wherever else -appropriate) `ChangeLog.*TOPIC*` file. +appropriate) `ChangeLog.TOPIC` file. Examples: * GNU Mach - * *master-gdb_stubs*: `ChangeLog.gdb` + * `master-gdb_stubs`: `ChangeLog.gdb` -This need not be a full-fledged [GNU-style *ChangeLog* +This need not be a full-fledged [GNU-style `ChangeLog` file](http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/Change-Logs.html). E.g., -don't waste time writing *ChangeLog* entries for debugging stuff that will be +don't waste time writing `ChangeLog` entries for debugging stuff that will be removed again before merging back into mainline. But please do write something. Short notes. ### Behavior on *private* branches Even though you are said to be the owner of branches tagged with your -*SAVANNAH_LOGIN*, it is generally nevertheless good to not do history-rewriting +`SAVANNAH_LOGIN`, it is generally nevertheless good to not do history-rewriting stuff and the like (`git rebase` and friends), as others may in turn be basing their work on your private branches. We could establish a branch-tagging policy for branches that others should expect their history possibly to be rewritten. This may be useful for branches that are only meant for aggregating the changes of (several) development -branches, like *master-proposed_for_general_testing*. +branches, like `master-proposed_for_general_testing`. ## Behavior in general -- cgit v1.2.3