From 78188ccfd77b9d5c6a0e95232536cdabc616bd85 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Schwinge Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 16:08:37 +0200 Subject: open_issues/bash_vs_screen_vs_sigint: Improve. --- open_issues/bash_vs_screen_vs_sigint.mdwn | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'open_issues') diff --git a/open_issues/bash_vs_screen_vs_sigint.mdwn b/open_issues/bash_vs_screen_vs_sigint.mdwn index 8260b004..c8a31a15 100644 --- a/open_issues/bash_vs_screen_vs_sigint.mdwn +++ b/open_issues/bash_vs_screen_vs_sigint.mdwn @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ this: * shell prompt: **`^C`, then new line / prompt printed**; `$?` is **128**. * `sleep 10` running: **`^C` printed**; SIGINT is sent; `$?` is 130. - This differs from the behavior of the earlier *bash* version in the MIG + This differs from the behavior of the earlier *bash* version in the MIG reply error in the not-*screen* case, and in the **128** value for `$?`. The former is an error, and the latter may be as expected. (Check GNU/Linux with that *bash* version.) @@ -63,6 +63,6 @@ this: To sum up: - * *bash*: 4.0 packages have the MIG error, and the 128 return value difference. - - * *screen*: new package doesn't react to `C-c` anymore. + * *bash*: 4.0 packages print `^C` at the shell prompt, have the MIG reply + error, and the difference in the value 128 for `$?`. + * *screen*: new package causes that invokee doesn't react to `C-c` anymore. -- cgit v1.2.3