From 95878586ec7611791f4001a4ee17abf943fae3c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "https://me.yahoo.com/a/g3Ccalpj0NhN566pHbUl6i9QF0QEkrhlfPM-#b1c14" Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 20:08:03 +0100 Subject: rename open_issues.mdwn to service_solahart_jakarta_selatan__082122541663.mdwn --- open_issues/proc_server_proc_exception_raise.mdwn | 37 ----------------------- 1 file changed, 37 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 open_issues/proc_server_proc_exception_raise.mdwn (limited to 'open_issues/proc_server_proc_exception_raise.mdwn') diff --git a/open_issues/proc_server_proc_exception_raise.mdwn b/open_issues/proc_server_proc_exception_raise.mdwn deleted file mode 100644 index 1d0e92a3..00000000 --- a/open_issues/proc_server_proc_exception_raise.mdwn +++ /dev/null @@ -1,37 +0,0 @@ -[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]] - -[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable -id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this -document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or -any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant -Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license -is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation -License|/fdl]]."]]"""]] - -[[!tag open_issue_hurd]] - -IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2011-08-11 - - < youpi> in which error cases a reply port will actually have been consumed - by mach_msg ? - < youpi> it seems at least MACH_SEND_NOTIFY_IN_PROGRESS do? - < braunr> - http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/gnumach-doc/Message-Send.html#Message-Send - < braunr> "These return codes imply that the message was returned to the - caller with a pseudo-receive operation: " - < braunr> isn't it what you're looking for ? - < youpi> well, it's hard to tell from the name - < youpi> I don't know what "pseudo-receiv operation" means - < braunr> it's described below - < youpi> ew - < braunr> it looks close enough to a normal receive to assume it consumes - the reply port - < youpi> so it's even more complex than what I thought - < youpi> well, no, it returns the right - < youpi> actually the error I'm getting is MACH_RCV_INVALID_NAME - < youpi> which I guess means the sending part succeeded - < youpi> the case at stake is proc/mgt.c: S_proc_exception_raise() - < youpi> when the proc_exception_raise() forward fails - < youpi> currently we always return 0, but if proc_exception_raise() - actually managed to send the message, the reply port was consumed and - MIG_NO_REPLY should be returned instead -- cgit v1.2.3