From be49aa7ddec52e121d562e14d4d93fd301b05fbb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Schwinge Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 19:19:35 +0100 Subject: IRC. --- open_issues/glibc/t/tls-threadvar.mdwn | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+) create mode 100644 open_issues/glibc/t/tls-threadvar.mdwn (limited to 'open_issues/glibc') diff --git a/open_issues/glibc/t/tls-threadvar.mdwn b/open_issues/glibc/t/tls-threadvar.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 00000000..f6a81590 --- /dev/null +++ b/open_issues/glibc/t/tls-threadvar.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ +[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]] + +[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable +id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this +document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or +any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant +Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license +is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation +License|/fdl]]."]]"""]] + +[[!tag open_issue_glibc open_issue_libpthread]] + +IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2011-10-23: + + youpi: If we want to replace threadvars with TLS, there is one + problem: the threadvars interface is publically exported: + /usr/include/hurd/threadvar.h. + youpi: But I am somewhat inclined to say that the only user of + this is libthreads/libpthread. Do you think differently? + tschwinge: that's very probable + so I think we can just drop it + (people should use TLS anyway) + +[[libpthread_set_stack_size]]. -- cgit v1.2.3