From 817df620bedae9c1daa0497f64a901d51e5bd2dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Schwinge Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 00:52:08 +0100 Subject: Some more IRC discussions. --- open_issues/ext2fs_page_cache_swapping_leak.mdwn | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+) create mode 100644 open_issues/ext2fs_page_cache_swapping_leak.mdwn (limited to 'open_issues/ext2fs_page_cache_swapping_leak.mdwn') diff --git a/open_issues/ext2fs_page_cache_swapping_leak.mdwn b/open_issues/ext2fs_page_cache_swapping_leak.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 00000000..0ace5cd3 --- /dev/null +++ b/open_issues/ext2fs_page_cache_swapping_leak.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]] + +[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable +id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this +document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or +any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant +Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license +is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation +License|/fdl]]."]]"""]] + +[[!tag open_issue_hurd]] + +IRC, OFTC, #debian-hurd, 2011-03-24 + + I still believe we have an ext2fs page cache swapping leak, however + as the 1.8GiB swap was full, yet the ld process was only 1.5GiB big + a leak at swapping time, you mean? + I mean the ext2fs page cache being swapped out instead of simply + dropped + ah + so the swap tends to accumulate unuseful stuff, i see + yes + the disk content, basicallyt :) -- cgit v1.2.3