From 95878586ec7611791f4001a4ee17abf943fae3c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "https://me.yahoo.com/a/g3Ccalpj0NhN566pHbUl6i9QF0QEkrhlfPM-#b1c14" Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 20:08:03 +0100 Subject: rename open_issues.mdwn to service_solahart_jakarta_selatan__082122541663.mdwn --- open_issues/elinks.mdwn | 28 ---------------------------- 1 file changed, 28 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 open_issues/elinks.mdwn (limited to 'open_issues/elinks.mdwn') diff --git a/open_issues/elinks.mdwn b/open_issues/elinks.mdwn deleted file mode 100644 index ee372971..00000000 --- a/open_issues/elinks.mdwn +++ /dev/null @@ -1,28 +0,0 @@ -[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]] - -[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable -id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this -document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or -any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant -Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license -is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation -License|/fdl]]."]]"""]] - -[[!tag open_issue_porting]] - -IRC, unknown channel, 2008-05-26 and later - - In elinks/src/network/state.h, there is an assumption that values of errno are between 0 and 100000. Now looking at glibc-2.5/sysdeps/mach/hurd/bits/errno.h, I see that you're using values outside this range. Have there been problems because of this? - eeerf - I had never seen a program assuming that - that sucks - It can be fixed, but that'd require some work, so I'd like to first have a clear idea of the effects. - fixed where ? - in elinks - k - by allocating just one number from our enum connection_state for system errors, and then stashing the errno value in a separate variable. - Anyway, if you see this cause any user-visible bugs in ELinks, please report. - - I mentioned here on 2008-05-26 that ELinks assumes errno values are between 0 and 100000 whereas the Hurd uses other values. I fixed this in ELinks last weekend; the most recent 0.12 and 0.13 snapshots should include the fix. If you find any remaining errno assumptions, please post to: http://bugzilla.elinks.cz/show_bug.cgi?id=1013 - or to one of our mailing lists. - I guess the pflocal select() bug http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?22861 is the primary hindrance to running ELinks on the Hurd. Has any decision been made on how that will be fixed? -- cgit v1.2.3