From 8d6921f753dc2b7abaa9b6ae0cde1a108f8c186d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Schwinge Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 00:21:07 +0200 Subject: open_issues/dbus_in_linux_kernel: New. --- open_issues/dbus_in_linux_kernel.mdwn | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+) create mode 100644 open_issues/dbus_in_linux_kernel.mdwn (limited to 'open_issues/dbus_in_linux_kernel.mdwn') diff --git a/open_issues/dbus_in_linux_kernel.mdwn b/open_issues/dbus_in_linux_kernel.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 00000000..7780fc08 --- /dev/null +++ b/open_issues/dbus_in_linux_kernel.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ +[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]] + +[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable +id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this +document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or +any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant +Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license +is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation +License|/fdl]]."]]"""]] + +Might be interesting to watch how this develops. + +IRC, #hurd, August / September 2010 + + check this out: + someone is working on implementing dbus in linux + linux finally gets mach ipc ;-) + it's old news though, unless there is an update + and I think it was only the client? + youpi : someone is adding dbus ipc to the linux kernel + marcusb: I just heard about it. + (it's crazy how this drives backward compared to a hurdish approach) + what is the motivation for moving to the kernel? + context switch overhead + they wanna use it to talk to device drivers? :) + well, they did that with the in-kernel web server, but they + abandonned it later on + azeem: I don't think so. + dbus in the kernel is actually good for the Hurd as dbus IPC is + basically neutered Mach IPC + I don't think anybody wants to put the dbus server in the kernel + well, there is at least one person + maybe this is a different news from the one I read + Alban Crequy (albanc) is working out. He works for collabora, fwiw + + + + what I read was about hal etc + so that you don't need a user space daemon to glue the kernel to the + dbus world + I don't think that is what he is talking about + I can't find it anymore though. I mentioned it in this channel at + the time though, so it should be in the backlog + neal, yeah could very well be a separate thing + neal, dbus does have marginal support for fd passing though, and some + attempts on the mailing list to make "fds" an official type in the message + failed (as far as I could see, I didn't read the whole discussion) + so no mach ipc just yet + wrong + FD handling is in 1.4 + type o, if I'm not mistaken + then the discussion moved on from initial rejection + no, 'h' + I'm out of date by two months + ok + neal: AFAIR Marcel Holtmann talked about dbus in-kernel several years + ago, but he never ended up implementing it, or there were rumors he had + private "working code" -- cgit v1.2.3 From 7d62a085aa1e82f4f717ab63bd8a08fb5680e818 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Schwinge Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 17:32:22 +0200 Subject: open_issues/dbus_in_linux_kernel: Add link to related mailing list discussion. --- open_issues/dbus_in_linux_kernel.mdwn | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) (limited to 'open_issues/dbus_in_linux_kernel.mdwn') diff --git a/open_issues/dbus_in_linux_kernel.mdwn b/open_issues/dbus_in_linux_kernel.mdwn index 7780fc08..a94e1fed 100644 --- a/open_issues/dbus_in_linux_kernel.mdwn +++ b/open_issues/dbus_in_linux_kernel.mdwn @@ -56,3 +56,9 @@ IRC, #hurd, August / September 2010 neal: AFAIR Marcel Holtmann talked about dbus in-kernel several years ago, but he never ended up implementing it, or there were rumors he had private "working code" + + * Related Mailing List Discussion + + * [\[PATCH 0/5\] RFC: Multicast and filtering features on + AF_UNIX](http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1040481), + 2010-09-24 -- cgit v1.2.3