From de3f3f6cc52d1e5013e85137d09f2ac23e657858 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Schwinge Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2014 20:10:58 +0100 Subject: IRC. --- microkernel/mach/deficiencies.mdwn | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++ .../hardware_compatibility_list/discussion.mdwn | 23 ++++++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'microkernel') diff --git a/microkernel/mach/deficiencies.mdwn b/microkernel/mach/deficiencies.mdwn index 4d261627..3ddb95de 100644 --- a/microkernel/mach/deficiencies.mdwn +++ b/microkernel/mach/deficiencies.mdwn @@ -3226,3 +3226,31 @@ In context of [[hurd/libports]], *Open Issues*, *IRC, freenode, #hurd, i don't intend the hurd to run on top of it the reason it's a rewrite is to fix a whole bunch of major issues in one go + + +## IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2014-03-03 + + braunr: x15 can be compiled successfully, is it possible to + run it on Hurd now? + nalaginrut: it will never be + x15 isn't a drop in mach replacement + for now it's stalled until i have more free time :/ + i need to rewrite virtual memory, and then implement ipc + oh, it's planed for standalone one? + it's planned for a hurd clone + sounds bigger plan than I thought ;-) + it is but not that much actually + it's just i have really little free time currently .. + and i chose to spend it on the hurd instead + it's easier to fix bugs when you have little time, than think and + write big and difficult features like an smp scalable VM system + yes, I understand + it take huge time to think and design + and relative easier to fix the current one + well, the whole thing is thought already + what's hard is taking care of the details + well, you're so self-confident, to my experiences, even if all + the designs are in my mind, issues may make me change the original design + a lot ;-) + alright, I saw the key line, everything exists, just assemble + it diff --git a/microkernel/mach/gnumach/hardware_compatibility_list/discussion.mdwn b/microkernel/mach/gnumach/hardware_compatibility_list/discussion.mdwn index 2b65956a..20c2cd44 100644 --- a/microkernel/mach/gnumach/hardware_compatibility_list/discussion.mdwn +++ b/microkernel/mach/gnumach/hardware_compatibility_list/discussion.mdwn @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2007, 2008, 2011 Free Software Foundation, +[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2007, 2008, 2011, 2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]] [[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ and could perhaps be incorporated into that page. # SATA -IRC, freenode, +hurd, 2011-07-24 +## IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2011-07-24 youpi: concerning the ide compatibility problem, it seems some bioses provide several modes @@ -31,3 +31,22 @@ IRC, freenode, +hurd, 2011-07-24 possibly with other IRQs i.e. you need a PCI driver to handle that ok + + +# IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2014-03-02 + + i bought a new mainboard for my hurd box + a ga-e350n + everything looks fine, grub loads gnumach, and, (afaict) it + starts it, but i see no single line printed by gnumach + the thing is, that this is the second board of this kind that i + bought + and on the first one, gnumach did work just fine + i tried it with a live cd, the same cd worked on the first + board, but does not on the second + also, i'm kind of surprised to see nothing at all from gnumach + i mean, it's loaded by grub + teythoon: you could try to put *(char*)0xb8000 = 'X' starting from + c_boot_entry + just to see at least something + i'll try, thanks :) -- cgit v1.2.3