From 2910b7c5b1d55bc304344b584a25ea571a9075fb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Schwinge Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 23:08:09 +0200 Subject: Prepare toolchain/logs/master branch. --- microkernel/mach/continuation.mdwn | 24 ------------------------ 1 file changed, 24 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 microkernel/mach/continuation.mdwn (limited to 'microkernel/mach/continuation.mdwn') diff --git a/microkernel/mach/continuation.mdwn b/microkernel/mach/continuation.mdwn deleted file mode 100644 index 7a3267f3..00000000 --- a/microkernel/mach/continuation.mdwn +++ /dev/null @@ -1,24 +0,0 @@ -[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]] - -[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable -id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this -document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or -any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant -Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license -is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation -License|/fdl]]."]]"""]] - -[[Mach]] internally uses *continuation*s for kernel [[thread]] management. - -The advantage is that not a full kernel thread stack has to be preserved in -case that a thread is about to enter a blocking state. This saves space. It -is not clear this is still worthwhile given today's RAM offerings. (How many -kernel threads are there, typically?) - -And, this would no longer be possible in case Mach were be made a -[[preemptive|preemtion]] kernel. In the latter case, the kernel itself, that -is, kernel threads can be preempted, and then their full state needs to be -preserved. - -[[!tag open_issue_documentation]] -- cgit v1.2.3