From 63f4ec75ac6b13e7b01d31ebe10704b40d49ba2a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 00:57:10 +0100
Subject: Revert "update for rename of open_issues/sendmsg_scm_creds.mdwn to
 service_solahart_jakarta_selatan__082122541663/sendmsg_scm_creds.mdwn"

This reverts commit 233ad40fbe6b430a8d40886b6edd3942de9903f0.
---
 hurd/translator/mtab/discussion.mdwn | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'hurd/translator')

diff --git a/hurd/translator/mtab/discussion.mdwn b/hurd/translator/mtab/discussion.mdwn
index 713edb0e..f85944a4 100644
--- a/hurd/translator/mtab/discussion.mdwn
+++ b/hurd/translator/mtab/discussion.mdwn
@@ -1883,7 +1883,7 @@ In context of [[service_solahart_jakarta_selatan__082122541663/mig_portable_rpc_
     <pinotree> imho solving the "who's the sender of an rpc" could solve both
       the SCM_CREDS implementation and the self case in procfs
 
-[[service_solahart_jakarta_selatan__082122541663/Sendmsg_scm_creds]],
+[[open_issues/SENDMSG_SCM_CREDS]],
 [[hurd/translator/procfs/jkoenig/discussion]], *`/proc/self`*.
 
     <braunr> pinotree: yes
-- 
cgit v1.2.3