From 51c95fc11727532e3b0d98c8470a6b60907a0680 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Schwinge Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 21:31:31 +0100 Subject: IRC. --- hurd/translator/pfinet/ipv6.mdwn | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+) (limited to 'hurd/translator') diff --git a/hurd/translator/pfinet/ipv6.mdwn b/hurd/translator/pfinet/ipv6.mdwn index d30cc850..edd31017 100644 --- a/hurd/translator/pfinet/ipv6.mdwn +++ b/hurd/translator/pfinet/ipv6.mdwn @@ -70,3 +70,27 @@ Amongst other things, support for [[IOCTL]]s is missing. ok i'd like to set this up on my VMs but it looks bugged :/ i can't manage to set correctly set the gateway + + +### IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2012-12-12 + + hm, pfinet seems not to support ipv6 well at all :( + braunr: really? + pinotree: i can't manage to set a global address statically and + make it communicate with neighbours + pfinet receives the advertisement (during neighbour discovery) but + immediately resends the same solicitation again + According to the pfinet/README IPv6 support was added in 2007 + from Linux 2.2.14 while the rest is from 2.2.12 + according to me, bugs were added at the same time + :p + in addition, ipv6 in linux 2.2 was, uh, not working well either + even with 2.4, it was still messy + maybe we should try to upgrade the TCP/IP stack to something + 2.6+? + (a lot of work though) + we've already had that discussion + Yes. What is the best way forward, a GSoC task? + There is one already: + http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/community/gsoc/project_ideas/tcp_ip_stack.html + personally, i'd advocate resuing code from netbsd -- cgit v1.2.3