From 47e4d194dc36adfcfd2577fa4630c9fcded005d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge@gnu.org>
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 19:15:06 +0100
Subject: IRC.

---
 hurd/subhurd/discussion.mdwn | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)

(limited to 'hurd/subhurd')

diff --git a/hurd/subhurd/discussion.mdwn b/hurd/subhurd/discussion.mdwn
index fac93625..892387ef 100644
--- a/hurd/subhurd/discussion.mdwn
+++ b/hurd/subhurd/discussion.mdwn
@@ -180,3 +180,37 @@ License|/fdl]]."]]"""]]
     <braunr> safer
     <braunr> perhaps more powerful too, but that entirely depends on the
       features you want inside
+
+
+# IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2013-10-04
+
+    <braunr> hm, looks like we broke subhurds again
+    <braunr> freezes after starting exec
+    <teythoon> o_O
+    <braunr> looks like some translator refuses to start
+    <braunr> teythoon: we need better error reporting first :)
+
+[[open_issues/subhurd_error_messages]].
+
+    <braunr> and better visibility in general
+    <braunr> teythoon: it may be that the subhurd i'm using is a bit od
+    <braunr> old
+    <braunr> one weird thing about subhurds is that they actually use the
+      ext2fs and linker from the host
+    <braunr> so it's better if the subhurd and the host uses the same bootstrap
+      protocol :)
+    <teythoon> braunr: isn't boot --boot-root=DIR there to specify which root
+      translator and linker to use?
+    <braunr> teythoon: yes but you don't want your root file system mounted
+      from the host when starting your subhurd
+    <teythoon> you can mount it r/o just fine, no?
+    <braunr> ideally, we'd have a userspace version of grub reading the files
+      from the disk, as it's done when booting
+    <braunr> hm
+    <braunr> right
+
+
+## IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2013-10-07
+
+    <teythoon> braunr: btw, did you straighten out your subhurd issue?
+    <braunr> teythoon: no i haven't
-- 
cgit v1.2.3