From 3bf27c93ac4de57623809b71517116d51465f0e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Schwinge Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 12:31:07 +0100 Subject: IRC bits. --- hurd/faq/slash_usr_symlink/discussion.mdwn | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+) create mode 100644 hurd/faq/slash_usr_symlink/discussion.mdwn (limited to 'hurd/faq/slash_usr_symlink') diff --git a/hurd/faq/slash_usr_symlink/discussion.mdwn b/hurd/faq/slash_usr_symlink/discussion.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 00000000..219e14e4 --- /dev/null +++ b/hurd/faq/slash_usr_symlink/discussion.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ +[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]] + +[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable +id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this +document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or +any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant +Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license +is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation +License|/fdl]]."]]"""]] + +[[!tag open_issue_documentation]] + + +# IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2012-02-01 + + I remember the time when we had a /usr symlink. Now fedora 17 + will move / to /usr and have /foo symlinks. :) + braunr: + http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/TheCaseForTheUsrMerge + braunr: fedora and others are merging /bin, /sbin and some other + into /usr + braunr: back in 1998 we tried for two years or so to have /usr -> + .. in Debian GNU/Hurd, but eventually we gave up on it, because it broke + some stuff + marcusb: Hi, which one is better (in your opinion): / or /usr? + gnu_srs: fedora says that using /usr allows better separation of + distribution files and machine-local files + marcusb: won't it break remote /usr ? + so you can atomically mount the OS files to /usr + gnu_srs: but in the end, it's a wash + personally, I think every package should get its own directory + marcusb: what PATH then ? + braunr: well, I guess you'd want to assemble a union filesystem + for a POSIX shell + marcusb: i don't see what you mean :/ + ah this comes from Lennart Poettering + braunr: check out for example how http://nixos.org/ does it + braunr: something like, union /package1/bin /package2/bin + /package3/bin for /bin, /package1/lib /package2/lib /package3/lib for + /lib, etc. I guess + manuel: would that scale well ? + the idea that there is only one correct binary for each program + with the name foo is noble, but a complete illusion that hides the + complexity of the actual configuration management task + marcusb: right -- cgit v1.2.3