From 6f3a380f3c1bc602b1b86dec307abf27f71bfef4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Schwinge Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 15:04:40 +0100 Subject: IRC. --- faq/binary_compatibility.mdwn | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ faq/network_transparency.mdwn | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+) create mode 100644 faq/binary_compatibility.mdwn create mode 100644 faq/network_transparency.mdwn (limited to 'faq') diff --git a/faq/binary_compatibility.mdwn b/faq/binary_compatibility.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 00000000..e9dfcdb8 --- /dev/null +++ b/faq/binary_compatibility.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ +[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]] + +[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable +id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this +document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or +any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant +Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license +is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation +License|/fdl]]."]]"""]] + +[[!tag open_issue_documentation]] + +IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2012-01-13: + + sothere's absolutelyno way,evenslowly to run i386 linuxcode + under hurd/i386? Ihave a small app, commercial, which I have to get + running there + no source + no way + you'd need to create a userspace linux server catching linux + system calls and calling hurd specific stuff to implement them + it doesn't exist, it may be hard to implement + some cases will definitely be hard to implement + so, no magic linux lxemu on windows? + or linuxemu on plan9 + nope + I remember somethingsilly, sonmone hadcompiled linux asauser + applicationon plan9 and inserted his own binaries as + acodeobject,toberunon plan9, for useon ibm hpc hatrdware + it was ron minich + 5e.iwp9.org/slides/linuxemu.pdf + I think that was it + google for linux & cnk for additional clues diff --git a/faq/network_transparency.mdwn b/faq/network_transparency.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 00000000..aefaf500 --- /dev/null +++ b/faq/network_transparency.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ +[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc."]] + +[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable +id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this +document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or +any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant +Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license +is included in the section entitled [[GNU Free Documentation +License|/fdl]]."]]"""]] + +[[!tag open_issue_documentation]] + +IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2012-01-21: + + is it possible to transfer servers running on one microkernel + on one machine, to another microkernel running on a different machine? + two machines will be running the complete os + well, if the code for network-transparent IPC still existed, it + might be possible to move a task to another machine, while keeping the + port associations with the original system... + if you mean actually moving it to another system, that's pretty + much impossible in any system that has stateful interfaces -- cgit v1.2.3