From 1e67a761cbfa94a69cec2f5709d23d7983cd0fc1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Schwinge Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 11:55:21 +0100 Subject: Talk about advantages, challenges, how many developers, why so few developers. --- community/gsoc/project_ideas/language_bindings.mdwn | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'community/gsoc/project_ideas') diff --git a/community/gsoc/project_ideas/language_bindings.mdwn b/community/gsoc/project_ideas/language_bindings.mdwn index 460b380b..c8a02390 100644 --- a/community/gsoc/project_ideas/language_bindings.mdwn +++ b/community/gsoc/project_ideas/language_bindings.mdwn @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ However, in practice this is not as easy as it should, because creating translators and other servers is quite involved -- the interfaces for doing that are not exactly simple, and available only for C programs. Being able to easily create simple translators in RAD languages is highly desirable, to -really be able to reap the advantages of the Hurd architecture. +really be able to reap the [[advantages]] of the Hurd architecture. Originally Lisp was meant to be the second system language besides C in the GNU system; but that doesn't mean we are bound to Lisp. Bindings for any popular -- cgit v1.2.3